指定@Transactional rollbackFor 是否还包括 RuntimeException [英] Does Specifying @Transactional rollbackFor Also Include RuntimeException

问题描述

@Transactional(rollbackFor = MyCheckedException.class)公共无效 foo() {抛出新的运行时异常()；}

这个事务会被回滚，还是我需要在注释中包含 RuntimeException.class ?

解决方案

无需在 rollbackFor 列表中包含 RuntimeException.即使您不提及它，它也会处理.

我已经为 jdbcTemplate 试过了:-

@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRED, rollbackFor = MyException.class)public void updateSalary(final int increment){jdbcTemplate.update("update EMPLOYEE set emp_salary = emp_salary + ?", increment);throw new RuntimeException("更新异常");}

<前>输出:插入后:1 迪帕克 350002 约格什 350003 阿迪亚 35000更新异常更新后1 迪帕克 350002 约格什 350003 阿迪亚 35000

@Transactional(rollbackFor = MyCheckedException.class)
public void foo() {
    throw new RuntimeException();    
}

Will this transaction get rolled back, or do I need to include RuntimeException.class in the annotation as well?

解决方案

No need to include RuntimeException in rollbackFor list. It will handle that even if you do not mention it.

I've tried it out for jdbcTemplate:-

@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRED, rollbackFor = MyException.class)
public void updateSalary(final int increment){
    jdbcTemplate.update("update EMPLOYEE set emp_salary = emp_salary + ?", increment);
    throw new RuntimeException("update exception");
}

Output:
After Insertion:
1 Deepak 35000
2 Yogesh 35000
3 Aditya 35000

update exception
After Update
1 Deepak 35000
2 Yogesh 35000
3 Aditya 35000

这篇关于指定@Transactional rollbackFor 是否还包括 RuntimeException的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！