Java是否优化了2的幂除以移位? [英] Does Java optimize division by powers of two to bitshifting?

查看:34
本文介绍了Java是否优化了2的幂除以移位?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

Java 编译器 JIT 编译器是否将除法或乘法优化为 2 的恒定幂以进行位移?

Does the Java compiler or the JIT compiler optimize divisions or multiplications by a constant power of two down to bitshifting?

例如,以下两个语句是否优化为相同?

For example, are the following two statements optimized to be the same?

int median = start + (end - start) >>> 1;
int median = start + (end - start) / 2;

(基本上 这个问题但对于 Java)

(basically this question but for Java)

推荐答案

不,Java 编译器不这样做,因为它无法确定 (end - start) 的标志是什么 将.为什么这很重要?负整数的位移产生与普通除法不同的结果.在这里你可以看到一个演示:这个简单的测试:

No, the Java compiler doesn't do that, because it can't be sure on what the sign of (end - start) will be. Why does this matter? Bit shifts on negative integers yield a different result than an ordinary division. Here you can see a demo: this simple test:

System.out.println((-10) >> 1);  // prints -5
System.out.println((-11) >> 1);  // prints -6
System.out.println((-11) / 2);   // prints -5

另外请注意,我使用 >> 而不是 >>>.>>> 是无符号位移,而 >> 是有符号的.

Also note that I used >> instead of >>>. A >>> is an unsigned bitshift, while >> is signed.

System.out.println((-10) >>> 1); // prints 2147483643


@Mystical:我写了一个基准测试,表明编译器/JVM 没有进行优化:https://ideone.com/aKDShA

这篇关于Java是否优化了2的幂除以移位?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆