$state.go(app.location) 和 $location.path("app/location") 有什么区别? [英] What is the difference between $state.go(app.location) and $location.path("app/location")?

问题描述

我最近开始使用 ionic 框架，里面有 angular js.为了在屏幕之间导航，我使用了 $location.path 并且效果很好.但是，在我下载的一个示例中，我看到 $state.go 被用来重定向到某个页面.我想知道两者的区别.

I have recently started using ionic framework, it has angular js in it. To navigate between screens, I was using $location.path and it's working great. However, in an example I've downloaded, I saw $state.go being used to redirect to some page. I would like to know the difference between the two.

推荐答案

$location 服务在 angular.js 框架上开箱即用，允许您管理位置对象(类似于纯 javascript 中的).$state 服务是 ui-router 模块的一部分，允许您以高级模式管理路由，贯穿视图的状态机管理.

The $location service is on the angular.js framework out of the box and allow you to manage location object (similar to that in pure javascript). The $state service is a part of ui-router module and allows you to manage routes in an advanced mode, throughout a state machine management of views.

如果你使用 ui-router，你应该更喜欢使用 $state 服务来管理状态/路由，因为状态抽象了路由的概念，你可以在不改变状态的情况下改变物理路由.

If you use ui-router, you should prefer to use $state service to manage states/routes because state abstracts the concept of route and you could change the physical routes without changing states.

除此之外，如果您在 hashbang 模式 下运行，您可能会遇到更多问题，尤其是在您的 html 链接中.在这种情况下，最好使用 ui-sref 而不是 ng-href(或只是 href).在我看来，您应该始终考虑状态而不是路径.显然，如果您知道自己在做什么，则可以混合使用这些服务

Besides that, more problems you could have if you run in hashbang mode, in particular in your html links. In this case it's preferable to use ui-sref rather than ng-href (or just href). In my opinion, you should always think in term of states rather than paths. Obviously you can mix the services if you know what you're doing

这篇关于$state.go(app.location) 和 $location.path("app/location") 有什么区别?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！