Mono 对于严肃的企业开发是否足够强大? [英] Is Mono robust enough for serious enterprise development?

问题描述

我已经有几年没有深入了解 Mono 了.当我最后一次查看时，就 BCL 实施而言，它并不完全存在，并且可用的工具是有限的.我现在特别需要做一些跨平台开发，并且想知道社区对 Mono 作为企业选择的看法.由于过去几年我的大部分开发工作都是在 .Net 中完成的，因此 Mono 似乎是一个自然的选择.不过，我不想推出经不起考验的技术.

It's been a few years since I've taken a deep look at Mono. When I last took a look, it wasnt quite there as far as BCL implementation and the tools available were limited. I have a specific need now to do some cross platform development, and was wondering what the community thought about Mono as a choice in the enterprise. Since I've been doing most of my dev work the past several years in .Net, Mono seems to be a natural choice. I don't want to push a technology that won't stand up to the test, however.

注意:我说的不是小型甚至中型项目.我说的是一个大型企业应用程序，它将使用面向服务的方法在全球范围内分布.此外，在 Mono 平台上编写的服务有多稳定?

Note: I'm NOT talking about a small or even medium sized project. I'm talking about a large scale enterprise application that will be distributed globally, utilizing a service oriented approach. Additionally, how stable are services written on the Mono platform?

感谢您的意见！

推荐答案

Mono 的鲁棒性已得到改进，足以满足重型 asp.net 网站的需求 - 2.0 版本已进行了大量的错误修复以提高稳定性.

Mono robustness have been improved to be adequate for heavy duty asp.net sites - a lot of bug fixing to improve stability have happened for the 2.0 release.

p>

不仅如此，我们还做了很多工作来提高堆栈的整体可扩展性.

Not only that but we did quite some work to improve the overall scalability of our stack.

其中大部分是在 2.0 版本中发布的，但有些是在此之后发生的，并且正在排队等待今年晚些时候即将推出的 2.2.

Most of it made into the 2.0 release but some happened after and is queued for the upcoming 2.2 later this year.

这篇关于Mono 对于严肃的企业开发是否足够强大?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！