C#UDP packetloss虽然所有的数据包到达(Wireshark的) [英] C# UDP packetloss though all packets arrive (WireShark)

查看:135
本文介绍了C#UDP packetloss虽然所有的数据包到达(Wireshark的)的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

正如标题所说我有一个问题,UDP在C#。 我试图建立一个图书馆的游戏DayZ的RCON协议。

我的问题是,我不接受每一个数据包,我应该接受。 发送命令后,服务器回复一个分裂的答案。该分组头包含的总数据包数和当前分组的索引。 现在,如果我应该得到17包我只得到我的应用程序8-15包。

使用Wireshark的测试后,我现在所有的包到我的电脑上知道的。他们只是不得到我的应用程序或类似的东西的认可。

我的实际问题是: 是否有可能以prevent我的网卡和我的应用程序之间失去了包?要么 为什么会发生呢?

下面是我目前的code。它的pretty的肮脏的,因为我工作不正常后,撕开它除了:

 专用插座_udpClient;
    私人螺纹_receiverThread;
    私人螺纹_workerThread;
    专用队列和LT; byte []的> _packetQueue;
    私人PacketBuffer [] MessageBuffer;
    专用字节SenderSequence = 0;
    私人IPEndPoint连接;

    公共RCON(ip地址IP,INT端口)
    {
        连接=新IPEndPoint(IP,端口);
        _udpClient =新的Socket(connection.Address.AddressFamily,SocketType.Dgram,ProtocolType.Udp);
        _udpClient.Connect(连接);
        MessageBuffer =新PacketBuffer [256];
        _packetQueue =新问答LT; byte []的>();

        _receiverThread =新主题(新的ThreadStart(ReceiveCallback));
        _receiverThread.IsBackground = TRUE;
        _receiverThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.AboveNormal;
        _receiverThread.Start();
        _workerThread =新主题(新的ThreadStart(WorkerCallback));
        _workerThread.IsBackground = TRUE;
        _workerThread.Start();
    }

    公共无效登录(字符串密码)
    {
        LoginPacket包=新LoginPacket(密码);

        _udpClient.Send(packet.Bytes);
    }

    公共无效SendCommand(字符串命令)
    {
        CommandPacket包=新CommandPacket(SenderSequence,命令);
        SenderSequence ++;

        _udpClient.Send(packet.Bytes);
    }

    私人无效ReceiveCallback()
    {

        而(真)
        {
                byte []的缓冲区=新的字节[1036];
                如果(_udpClient.Receive(缓冲液)大于0)
                    _packetQueue.Enqueue(缓冲液);
        }
    }

    私人无效WorkerCallback()
    {
        而(真)
        {
            如果(_packetQueue.Count大于0)
            {
                byte []的缓冲区= _packetQueue.Dequeue();

                如果(缓冲!= NULL)
                {
                    尝试
                    {
                        分组receivedPacket = Packet.ParseIncoming(缓冲液);

                        OnPacketReceived(新PacketReceivedEventArgs(receivedPacket));

                        开关(receivedPacket.Type)
                        {
                            案例PacketType.Message:
                                OnMessageReceived(新MessageReceivedEventArgs(receivedPacket.Content));
                                MessageCallbackPacket包=新MessageCallbackPacket(receivedPacket.SequenceNumber);
                                _udpClient.Send(packet.Bytes);
                                打破;
                            案例PacketType.CommandCallback:
                                如果(MessageBuffer [receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] == NULL)
                                    MessageBuffer [receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] =新PacketBuffer(receivedPacket);
                                其他
                                    MessageBuffer [receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] .AddPacket(receivedPacket);

                                如果(MessageBuffer [receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] .IsComplete)
                                    OnCommandCallback(新CommandCallbackEventArgs(MessageBuffer [receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] .GetContent()));
                                打破;
                        }
                    }
                    赶上(ArgumentException的){}
                    赶上(发生OverflowException){}
                    赶上(出现FormatException){}
                }
            }
        }
    }
 

解决方案

这通常是因为你不占用你的数据报速度不够快,所以在内核套接字缓冲区满和网络堆栈开始下降新到达的数据包。一些要点:

  • 增加接收缓冲区插座上,
  • 请不要购买在每次迭代锁 - 多读就可以了,然后把数据放入队列,
  • 在考虑无阻塞的方式,而不是线程。

As the title says I have a problem with UDP in C#. I'm trying to build a library for the rcon protocol of the game DayZ.

My problem is that I dont receive every packet I should receive. After sending a command the server replies with an split answer. The packet header contains the total packet count and the index of the current packet. Now if I should get 17 packets I only get 8-15 packets in my application.

After testing with WireShark I know now that all packages arrive on my computer. They just dont get recognized by my application or something like that.

My Actual Question is: Is it possible to prevent losing the packages between my network card and my application? or Why does that happen?

Here is my current code. Its pretty dirty because I ripped it apart after not working as expected:

    private Socket _udpClient;
    private Thread _receiverThread;
    private Thread _workerThread;
    private Queue<byte[]> _packetQueue;
    private PacketBuffer[] MessageBuffer;
    private byte SenderSequence = 0;
    private IPEndPoint connection;

    public RCon(IPAddress ip, int port)
    {
        connection = new IPEndPoint(ip, port);
        _udpClient = new Socket(connection.Address.AddressFamily, SocketType.Dgram, ProtocolType.Udp);
        _udpClient.Connect(connection);
        MessageBuffer = new PacketBuffer[256];
        _packetQueue = new Queue<byte[]>();

        _receiverThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(ReceiveCallback));
        _receiverThread.IsBackground = true;
        _receiverThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.AboveNormal;
        _receiverThread.Start();
        _workerThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(WorkerCallback));
        _workerThread.IsBackground = true;
        _workerThread.Start();
    }

    public void Login(string password)
    {
        LoginPacket packet = new LoginPacket(password);

        _udpClient.Send(packet.Bytes);
    }

    public void SendCommand(string command)
    {
        CommandPacket packet = new CommandPacket(SenderSequence, command);
        SenderSequence++;

        _udpClient.Send(packet.Bytes);
    }

    private void ReceiveCallback()
    {

        while (true)
        {
                byte[] buffer = new byte[1036];
                if (_udpClient.Receive(buffer) > 0)
                    _packetQueue.Enqueue(buffer);
        }
    }

    private void WorkerCallback()
    {
        while (true)
        {
            if (_packetQueue.Count > 0)
            {
                byte[] buffer = _packetQueue.Dequeue();

                if (buffer != null)
                {
                    try
                    {
                        Packet receivedPacket = Packet.ParseIncoming(buffer);

                        OnPacketReceived(new PacketReceivedEventArgs(receivedPacket));

                        switch (receivedPacket.Type)
                        {
                            case PacketType.Message:
                                OnMessageReceived(new MessageReceivedEventArgs(receivedPacket.Content));
                                MessageCallbackPacket packet = new MessageCallbackPacket(receivedPacket.SequenceNumber);
                                _udpClient.Send(packet.Bytes);
                                break;
                            case PacketType.CommandCallback:
                                if (MessageBuffer[receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] == null)
                                    MessageBuffer[receivedPacket.SequenceNumber] = new PacketBuffer(receivedPacket);
                                else
                                    MessageBuffer[receivedPacket.SequenceNumber].AddPacket(receivedPacket);

                                if (MessageBuffer[receivedPacket.SequenceNumber].IsComplete)
                                    OnCommandCallback(new CommandCallbackEventArgs(MessageBuffer[receivedPacket.SequenceNumber].GetContent()));
                                break;
                        }
                    }
                    catch (ArgumentException) { }
                    catch (OverflowException) { }
                    catch (FormatException) { }
                }
            }
        }
    }

解决方案

This is usually because you are not consuming your datagrams fast enough, so in-kernel socket buffer gets full and the network stack starts dropping newly arriving packets. Some points:

  • Increase the receive buffer on the socket,
  • Don't acquire locks on every iteration - read as much as you can, then put data into the queue,
  • Consider non-blocking approach instead of threads.

这篇关于C#UDP packetloss虽然所有的数据包到达(Wireshark的)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆