按组将缺失值 (NA) 替换为最近的非 NA [英] Replace missing values (NA) with most recent non-NA by group

查看:23
本文介绍了按组将缺失值 (NA) 替换为最近的非 NA的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

I would like to solve the following problem with dplyr. Preferable with one of the window-functions. I have a data frame with houses and buying prices. The following is an example:

houseID      year    price 
1            1995    NA
1            1996    100
1            1997    NA
1            1998    120
1            1999    NA
2            1995    NA
2            1996    NA
2            1997    NA
2            1998    30
2            1999    NA
3            1995    NA
3            1996    44
3            1997    NA
3            1998    NA
3            1999    NA

I would like to make a data frame like this:

houseID      year    price 
1            1995    NA
1            1996    100
1            1997    100
1            1998    120
1            1999    120
2            1995    NA
2            1996    NA
2            1997    NA
2            1998    30
2            1999    30
3            1995    NA
3            1996    44
3            1997    44
3            1998    44
3            1999    44

Here are some data in the right format:

# Number of houses
N = 15

# Data frame
df = data.frame(houseID = rep(1:N,each=10), year=1995:2004, price =ifelse(runif(10*N)>0.15, NA,exp(rnorm(10*N))))

Is there a dplyr-way to do that?

解决方案

These all use na.locf from the zoo package. Also note that na.locf0 (also defined in zoo) is like na.locf except it defaults to na.rm = FALSE and requires a single vector argument. na.locf2 defined in the first solution is also used in some of the others.

dplyr

library(dplyr)
library(zoo)

na.locf2 <- function(x) na.locf(x, na.rm = FALSE)
df %>% group_by(houseID) %>% do(na.locf2(.)) %>% ungroup

giving:

Source: local data frame [15 x 3]
Groups: houseID

   houseID year price
1        1 1995    NA
2        1 1996   100
3        1 1997   100
4        1 1998   120
5        1 1999   120
6        2 1995    NA
7        2 1996    NA
8        2 1997    NA
9        2 1998    30
10       2 1999    30
11       3 1995    NA
12       3 1996    44
13       3 1997    44
14       3 1998    44
15       3 1999    44

A variation of this is:

df %>% group_by(houseID) %>% mutate(price = na.locf0(price)) %>% ungroup

Other solutions below give output which is quite similar so we won't repeat it except where the format differs substantially.

Another possibility is to combine the by solution (shown further below) with dplyr:

df %>% by(df$houseID, na.locf2) %>% bind_rows

by

library(zoo)

do.call(rbind, by(df, df$houseID, na.locf2))

ave

library(zoo)

transform(df, price = ave(price, houseID, FUN = na.locf0))

data.table

library(data.table)
library(zoo)

data.table(df)[, na.locf2(.SD), by = houseID]

zoo This solution uses zoo alone. It returns a wide rather than long result:

library(zoo)

z <- read.zoo(df, index = 2, split = 1, FUN = identity)
na.locf2(z)

giving:

       1  2  3
1995  NA NA NA
1996 100 NA 44
1997 100 NA 44
1998 120 30 44
1999 120 30 44

This solution could be combined with dplyr like this:

library(dplyr)
library(zoo)

df %>% read.zoo(index = 2, split = 1, FUN = identity) %>% na.locf2

input

Here is the input used for the examples above:

df <- structure(list(houseID = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 
  2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L), year = c(1995L, 1996L, 1997L, 1998L, 
  1999L, 1995L, 1996L, 1997L, 1998L, 1999L, 1995L, 1996L, 1997L, 
  1998L, 1999L), price = c(NA, 100L, NA, 120L, NA, NA, NA, NA, 
  30L, NA, NA, 44L, NA, NA, NA)), .Names = c("houseID", "year", 
  "price"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -15L))

REVISED Re-arranged and added more solutions. Revised dplyr/zoo solution to conform to latest changes dplyr. Applied fixed and factored out na.locf2 from all solutions.

这篇关于按组将缺失值 (NA) 替换为最近的非 NA的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆