替代ViewBag.Title在ASP.NET MVC 3 [英] Alternative to ViewBag.Title in ASP.NET MVC 3

问题描述

默认情况下，ASP.NET MVC 3的新项目模板中添加以下为默认布局（以剃刀母版）：

By default the new project template for ASP.NET MVC 3 adds the following to the default layout (masterpage in razor):

<title>@ViewBag.Title</title>

视图必须然后包含以下分配页面的标题，比如：

The view must then contain the following to assign the title of the page, for instance:

@{
     ViewBag.Title = "Log On";
}

也许这只是我自己的preference但我发现使用ViewBag举行的称号有点不对（我想得太多了魔串味）。所以我的问题是：这种使用ASP.NET MVC 3剃须刀和（使用动态属性包），或者是你选择了更多的东西强类型的（可能涉及一个自定义的基类？）

Perhaps it is just my own preference but I find that using the ViewBag to hold the title a little bit wrong (I'm thinking too much magic-string flavor). So my question is: Is this the recommended best practice for people using ASP.NET MVC 3 and razor (using a dynamic property bag) or are you opting for something more strongly typed (perhaps involving a custom baseclass?)

推荐答案

我不认为这是坏的默认标题处理功能附带asp.net MVC3，其奥基做任何事情。

i dont think there is any thing bad with default title handling feature that ships with asp.net mvc3, its okie to do.

我个人是这样（写在下面）来处理的标题，我不是赞同低于code 或说其比默认功能更好的，它只是一个preference。

I personally do this(below written) to handle title, I am not endorsing the below code or saying that its better than default functionality, its just a preference.

主

<title>
   @RenderSection("Title");
</title>

查看

@section Title
{
 write title
}

有一件事我可以建议改善默认功能

@{
   string pageTitle=@ViewBag.Title ?? "Title Not Set";
}
<title>@pageTitle</title>

所以每当你忘了将它添加在viewbag，页面上会显示标题= 标题没有设置

创建一个基类，然后让所有的控制器从基类继承也可以做。但我认为它需要这么多的痛苦，为标题。

Creating a base class then making all your controllers inherit from that base-class can also be done. But i think its taking so much of pain for title.

这篇关于替代ViewBag.Title在ASP.NET MVC 3的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！