ResolveBundleUrl没有解决所有的文件吗？ [英] ResolveBundleUrl not resolving all files?

问题描述

我是新来的MVC所以以为我会开始一个新的项目，并尝试一些在MVC4的新功能。我在我的内容两个CSS文件目录， normalise_mini 和的site.css 。当我用下面的code：

I am new to MVC so thought I would start a new project and try out some of the new features in MVC4. I have two css files in my Content directory, normalise_mini and site.css. When I use the following code:

<link href="@System.Web.Optimization.BundleTable.Bundles.ResolveBundleUrl("~/Content/css")" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />

只需要我的的site.css 文件不是我的规范化文件。我在我的应用程序启动以下内容：

It only takes my site.css file not my normalisation file. I have the following in my app start:

protected void Application_Start()
{

    // Remove all other view engines except razor:
    ViewEngines.Engines.Clear();
    ViewEngines.Engines.Add(new RazorViewEngine());

    AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();

    RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
    RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);

    BundleTable.Bundles.RegisterTemplateBundles();
    BundleTable.Bundles.EnableDefaultBundles();
}

我是否需要为每个CSS文件捆绑（如这的人做）？或者，它应该只是找到所有自动将CSS文件（这是我所期望的是默认的行为）。我开始这个项目的基础上的Razor视图引擎空网站（这实际上是不为空都：/），这可能是值得一提的

Do I need to create a bundle for each css file (as this person is doing)? Or should it just find all the css files automatically (which I would expect to be the default behaviour). It might be worth noting that I started this project as a Empty Website based on Razor view engine (which actually wasn't empty at all :/)

在此先感谢

更新

据发布的链接，我需要注释掉注册模板包线。例如：

According to the link posted, I need to comment out the line that registers the template bundles. Eg:

protected void Application_Start()
{

    // Remove all other view engines except razor:
    ViewEngines.Engines.Clear();
    ViewEngines.Engines.Add(new RazorViewEngine());

    AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();

    RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
    RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);

    //BundleTable.Bundles.RegisterTemplateBundles();  // This is not needed
    BundleTable.Bundles.EnableDefaultBundles();
}

这现在工作。我的想法是，这两个行应该没有任何问题并存。我想这是由设计，但它是坏的设计？

This now works. My thoughts are that the two lines should co-exist without any problems. I guess it's by design, but is it bad design?

推荐答案

有人已回答了这个问题：

Someone else has already answered this question:

的http://forums.asp.net/t/1776599.aspx/1?MVC+4+0+Bundling+Minification+not+working+

更新：

有人有pssed担心，链接可能不足以回答这个问题前$ P $。虽然我仍然认为，人谁访问这个页面应该链接线，简单的答案是从的Application_Start（删除BundleTable.Bundles.RegisterTemplateBundles（）线）和BundleTable.Bundles.EnableDefaultBundles取代它（）

Someone has expressed concern that a link may not be enough to answer the question. Although I still believe that someone who visits this page should read the linked thread, the short answer is to remove the BundleTable.Bundles.RegisterTemplateBundles() line from Application_Start() and replace it with BundleTable.Bundles.EnableDefaultBundles()

这篇关于ResolveBundleUrl没有解决所有的文件吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！