在Win8的Makefile文件编译/ Ubuntu的行为会有所不同？ [英] Compile Makefile on Win8/Ubuntu behaves differently?
本文介绍了在Win8的Makefile文件编译/ Ubuntu的行为会有所不同？的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！
问题描述
我得到了C- code，写在一些Linux派生的，我想端口到Windows。
我做了一些改动Makefile文件和使用的mingw32-make来编译它们。
直到我看到的结果所产生的执行文件工作得很好。结果
该程序用于使某些数据分析和应导致数字的20和100的一个实例的数据之间的商，应该有围绕48.442 3号。结果，
然而，当我运行Windows的可执行我避开292136359165898530000000000000000000000000000.000 3号
I got a C-Code, written in some Linux Derivation which I wanted to port into Windows.
I made some alterations to the Makefile and used mingw32-make to compile them.
The produced executive file worked fine until I saw the result.
The program is used to make some data-analysis and should result in a List of numbers between 20 and 100. For an example Data, there should be 3 Numbers around 48.442 .
However, when I run the Windows-executable I get 3 Numbers around 292136359165898530000000000000000000000000000.000
然后我安装VirtualBox和试图运行使用制造为控制台的命令原来的Makefile，但它抱怨，认为数学libary不要求（POW未定义等），虽然-lm插在每一个海湾合作委员会的命令。
Then I installed virtualbox and tried to run the original Makefile using "make" as console-command, but it complains, that the math-libary isn't requested (pow undefined etc.), although the -lm is inserted on every gcc command.
窗户的Makefile：
The windows Makefile:
COMPILER_OPT = -O3
all: extract_timestamps
extract_timestamps: extract_timestamps.c collection.o filename_treatment.o basic_analysis.o read_lecroy_file.o read_tek_file.o stamp_handling.o treat_lecroy_file.o treat_tek_file.o save_timestamps.o injection_statistics.o calc_time_stamp.o peak_finding.o get_timestamps.o time_ext.h -lm
gcc -lm -o extract_timestamps.exe basic_analysis.c calc_time_stamp.c collection.c extract_timestamps.c filename_treatment.c get_timestamps.c injection_statistics.c peak_finding.c read_lecroy_file.c read_tek_file.c save_timestamps.c stamp_handling.c treat_lecroy_file.c treat_tek_file.c $(COMPILER_OPT)
get_timestamps.o: get_timestamps.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c get_timestamps.c -lm
peak_finding.o: peak_finding.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o peak_finding.o peak_finding.c -lm
calc_time_stamp.o: calc_time_stamp.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o calc_time_stamp.o calc_time_stamp.c -lm
injection_statistics.o: injection_statistics.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o injection_statistics.o injection_statistics.c -lm
save_timestamps.o: save_timestamps.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o save_timestamps.o save_timestamps.c -lm
filename_treatment.o: filename_treatment.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o filename_treatment.o filename_treatment.c -lm
basic_analysis.o: basic_analysis.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o basic_analysis.o basic_analysis.c -lm
collection.o: collection.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o collection.o collection.c -lm
read_lecroy_file.o: read_lecroy_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o read_lecroy_file.o read_lecroy_file.c -lm
read_tek_file.o: read_tek_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o read_tek_file.o read_tek_file.c -lm
stamp_handling.o: stamp_handling.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o stamp_handling.o stamp_handling.c -lm
treat_lecroy_file.o: treat_lecroy_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o treat_lecroy_file.o treat_lecroy_file.c -lm
treat_tek_file.o: treat_tek_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o treat_tek_file.o treat_tek_file.c -lm
clean:
delete filename_treatment.o basic_analysis.o collection.o read_lecroy_file.o stamp_handling.o treat_lecroy_file.o save_timestamps.o injection_statistics.o calc_time_stamp.o peak_finding.o extract_timestamps read_tek_file.o treat_tek_file.o
Ubuntu的Makefile文件：
The ubuntu Makefile:
COMPILER_OPT = -O3
all: extract_timestamps
extract_timestamps: extract_timestamps.c filename_treatment.o basic_analysis.o collection.o \
read_lecroy_file.o read_tek_file.o stamp_handling.o treat_lecroy_file.o \
treat_tek_file.o save_timestamps.o injection_statistics.o calc_time_stamp.o \
peak_finding.o get_timestamps.o time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -o extract_timestamps extract_timestamps.c filename_treatment.o \
basic_analysis.o collection.o read_lecroy_file.o read_tek_file.o stamp_handling.o \
treat_lecroy_file.o treat_tek_file.o save_timestamps.o injection_statistics.o \
calc_time_stamp.o peak_finding.o get_timestamps.o; chmod go+rx extract_timestamps -lm
get_timestamps.o: get_timestamps.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c get_timestamps.c -lm
peak_finding.o: peak_finding.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o peak_finding.o peak_finding.c -lm
calc_time_stamp.o: calc_time_stamp.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o calc_time_stamp.o calc_time_stamp.c -lm
injection_statistics.o: injection_statistics.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o injection_statistics.o injection_statistics.c -lm
save_timestamps.o: save_timestamps.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o save_timestamps.o save_timestamps.c -lm
filename_treatment.o: filename_treatment.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o filename_treatment.o filename_treatment.c -lm
basic_analysis.o: basic_analysis.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o basic_analysis.o basic_analysis.c -lm
collection.o: collection.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o collection.o collection.c -lm
read_lecroy_file.o: read_lecroy_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o read_lecroy_file.o read_lecroy_file.c -lm
read_tek_file.o: read_tek_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o read_tek_file.o read_tek_file.c -lm
stamp_handling.o: stamp_handling.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o stamp_handling.o stamp_handling.c -lm
treat_lecroy_file.o: treat_lecroy_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o treat_lecroy_file.o treat_lecroy_file.c -lm
treat_tek_file.o: treat_tek_file.c time_ext.h
gcc $(COMPILER_OPT) -c -o treat_tek_file.o treat_tek_file.c -lm
clean:
rm filename_treatment.o basic_analysis.o collection.o \
read_lecroy_file.o stamp_handling.o treat_lecroy_file.o save_timestamps.o \
injection_statistics.o calc_time_stamp.o peak_finding.o \
read_tek_file.o treat_tek_file.o \
命令行的命令是的mingw32-的make.exe和做不带参数和目录中。
Commandline-commands are "mingw32-make.exe" and "make" without parameters and inside the directory.
我不得不说，我通常不直接编译这样。结果
通常我让自己被一些图形用户界面，有工作的默认设置编译一些正确的安慰。这可能是为什么我想基本的东西在这里。
I have to say, I usually don't compile directly like that.
Usually I let myself be comforted by some GUI that has working default settings to compile something right. That's probably why I miss something basic here.
能否请你告诉我，为什么Windows的可执行文件是治疗的数字错了，我为什么不能到Ubuntu中编译？
Can you please tell me why the windows-executable is treating numbers wrong and why I fail to compile within ubuntu?
编辑：结果
这里是主要的C- code：
Here is the main C-code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#include "time_ext.h"
#define DEBUG
//#undef DEBUG
typedef struct{
char Inputfile[64];
char Outputfile[64];
double Fraction;
int Shift;
double Threshold;
int timing;
int TekwithCapHeader; /* 1=tektronix with capital header letter,0=LeCroy */
int TekwithSmallHeader; /* 1=tektronix with small header letter,0=LeCroy */
}gParameters;
gParameters gParms={
"infile.dat",
"outfile.times",
0.5, /* fraction */
8, /* shift */
-8.0, /* threshold in volts */
2, /* timing method; 1=extrapolation to zero, 2=cfd,3=single threshold*/
0, /* type of the scope with a Capital header*/
0 /* type of the scope with a small header*/
};
main(int argc, char **argv){
int subroutine_return_value;
FILE *listfp,*outfp,*logfp;
char lecroyfilename[256],logfilename[256];
char tekfilename[256], tekheaderfilename[256];
/* int events=0,file_nr=0,shot=0,total_events=0; */
void *extr_parameters;
sTraceLimits limits;
int shot_number=0;
int number_of_shots;
int number_of_signals_in_shot, number_of_signals_total;
// int treat_lecroy_files(char *, FILE *, void *, FILE *,int, int *); /* might change */
uExtractedParameter get_extraction_parameter(void *, int, int);
void *parameter_collection(gParameters);
/* start code */
/* initialize some things */
if(getArgs(argc,argv)!=0){
printf(" !! invalid arguments.....\n ...... bye!\n");exit(-3);}
sprintf(logfilename,"%s.log",gParms.Outputfile);
if((listfp=fopen(gParms.Inputfile,"r"))==NULL){
fprintf(stderr," !! ERROR: can't open main-inputfile %s, terminating...\n",gParms.Inputfile);exit(-1);}
if((outfp=fopen(gParms.Outputfile,"w"))==NULL){
fprintf(stderr," !! ERROR: can't open outputfile %s, terminating...\n",gParms.Outputfile);exit(-1);}
if((logfp=fopen(logfilename,"w"))==NULL){
fprintf(stderr," !! ERROR: can't open logfile %s, terminating...\n",logfilename);exit(-1);}
fprintf(logfp,"logfile to outputfile %s created from inputfile %s\n"
"user-changeable settings:\n"
"shift = %d bins\tfraction = %le\tthreshold=%le V\n"\
"timing method=%2d\n"
"report on single files to follow\n\n",
gParms.Outputfile,gParms.Inputfile,
gParms.Shift,gParms.Fraction,gParms.Threshold,gParms.timing);
extr_parameters=parameter_collection(gParms);
limits.limits_active=LIMITS_INACTIVE;
/*** if switch -X or -x ****/
if((gParms.TekwithCapHeader ==1)||(gParms.TekwithSmallHeader ==1))
{
/* treat the Tektronix file */
while(!feof(listfp)){
fgets(tekfilename,256,listfp);
if(feof(listfp)) continue;
if(tekfilename[strlen(tekfilename)-1]=='\n')
tekfilename[strlen(tekfilename)-1]='\0';
#ifdef DEBUG
printf(" *starting treating file %s\n",tekfilename);
#endif
subroutine_return_value=treat_tek_file(tekfilename, tekheaderfilename,
outfp,extr_parameters,logfp,limits,
shot_number, &number_of_signals_in_shot, &number_of_shots);
/* does everything, or should do so at least ;-) */
/* but now handle the return_value !!! */
/* next sum the statistics, once it is returned by treat_lecroy_file */
if(number_of_signals_in_shot>0){
shot_number += number_of_shots;
number_of_signals_total+=number_of_signals_in_shot;
}
}
}
else
{
/* treat LeCroy file */
while(!feof(listfp)){
fgets(lecroyfilename,256,listfp);
if(feof(listfp)) continue;
if(lecroyfilename[strlen(lecroyfilename)-1]=='\n')
lecroyfilename[strlen(lecroyfilename)-1]='\0';
#ifdef DEBUG
printf(" *start treating file %s\n",lecroyfilename);
#endif
subroutine_return_value=treat_lecroy_file(lecroyfilename,outfp,extr_parameters,logfp,limits,
shot_number, &number_of_signals_in_shot);
/* does everything, or should do so at least ;-) */
/* but now handle the return_value !!! */
/* next sum the statistics, once it is returned by treat_lecroy_file */
if(number_of_signals_in_shot>0){
shot_number++;
number_of_signals_total+=number_of_signals_in_shot;
}
}
}
fclose(outfp);
fclose(logfp);
printf("\n");
}
/* **********************************8 subroutines ****************************************8 */
int getArgs(int argc,char **argv)
{ char opt;
int back=0;
int usage(char *);
if(argc==1) usage(argv[0]);
// while ((opt = (char)getopt(argc,argv,"hi:o:f:g:b:p:c:t:u:s:xX")) !=EOF)
while ((opt = (char)getopt(argc,argv,"hi:o:t:f:b:e:xX")) !=EOF)
{
switch(opt)
{
case 'h': usage(argv[0]); break;
case 'i': strcpy(gParms.Inputfile,optarg); break;
case 'o': strcpy(gParms.Outputfile,optarg); break;
case 't': gParms.Threshold=-fabs((double)atof(optarg)); break;
case 'f': gParms.Fraction=(double)atof(optarg); break;
case 'b': gParms.Shift=atoi(optarg); break;
case 'e': gParms.timing=atoi(optarg); break;
case 'x': gParms.TekwithSmallHeader=1; break;
case 'X': gParms.TekwithCapHeader=1; break;
/* case 'f': gParms.Minimum_efficiency=(double)atof(optarg); break; */
case '?': back=-1; break; /* to return error */
}
}
return(back);
}
int usage(char *programm)
{ fprintf(stderr,
"\n usage: %s \n\n"
" -h usage\n"
" -i [filename] inputfile Def: infile.dat\n"
" -o [filename] outputfile Def: outfile.times\n"
" -t [double] Threshold Def: -8. V \n"
" -f [double] Fraction Def: 0.5 \n"
" -b [int] Shift in bin Def: 4 \n"
" -e [int] Timestamps extraction Def: 1 \n"
" -x,X for Tektronix format \n\n"
" inputfile is one file containing a list of LeCroy or Tektornix Datafiles\n"
" outputfile contains timestamps in ns, shots separated by blank line\n"
" in addition a log-file (outputfile.log) is created\n"
" options t is the threshold, in fact threshold*sigma(of noise) is the threshold\n"
" For tektronix data (high sampling rate >= 20Gs/s): \n"
" -t: threshod, actual threshold is: threshold*sigma \n"
" -e: timing method. 1=extraploation to zero (by linear fit), 2=cfd (by linear fit).\n"
" -X, -x respectively correspond to *.WFD and *.wfd(header file),however, in my case \n"
" this does not matter, and the present version can deal with the header automatically \n"
" For LeCroy data (low sampling rate < 20 Gs/s): \n"
" -t: threshod, actual threshold is: threshold*sigma \n"
" -f: fraction, \n"
" -b: shift in bin, \n"
" time stamp discriminator: normal cfd, \n"
" Last modified 2008.10 Baohua Sun \n\n",
programm);
exit(-1);
}
结果
Makefile文件见上
输出Linux的：
Makefile see above
Output Linux:
gcc -Wall -g -o extract_timestamps extract_timestamps.c filename_treatment.o \
basic_analysis.o collection.o read_lecroy_file.o read_tek_file.o stamp_handling.o \
treat_lecroy_file.o treat_tek_file.o save_timestamps.o injection_statistics.o \
calc_time_stamp.o peak_finding.o get_timestamps.o; chmod go+rx extract_timestamps -lm
extract_timestamps.c:37:1: Warnung: Rückgabetyp ist auf »int« voreingestellt [-Wreturn-type]
extract_timestamps.c: In Funktion »main«:
extract_timestamps.c:59:3: Warnung: Implizite Deklaration der Funktion »getArgs« [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
extract_timestamps.c:93:7: Warnung: Implizite Deklaration der Funktion »treat_tek_file« [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
extract_timestamps.c:122:5: Warnung: Implizite Deklaration der Funktion »treat_lecroy_file« [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
extract_timestamps.c:38:7: Warnung: Variable »subroutine_return_value« gesetzt, aber nicht verwendet [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
extract_timestamps.c:140:1: Warnung: Kontrollfluss erreicht Ende von Nicht-void-Funktion [-Wreturn-type]
basic_analysis.o: In function `get_baseline':
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x7b): undefined reference to `pow'
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x216): undefined reference to `sqrt'
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x241): undefined reference to `pow'
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x263): undefined reference to `sqrt'
basic_analysis.o: In function `get_tek_baseline':
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x2fb): undefined reference to `pow'
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x496): undefined reference to `sqrt'
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x4c1): undefined reference to `pow'
basic_analysis.c:(.text+0x4e3): undefined reference to `sqrt'
read_tek_file.o: In function `read_tek_data':
read_tek_file.c:(.text+0x362): undefined reference to `pow'
calc_time_stamp.o: In function `fitline':
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x165): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.o: In function `timestamp_line':
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x323): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x349): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.o: In function `timestamp_parabola1':
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0xc28): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.o: In function `timestamp_parabola2':
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x1063): undefined reference to `pow'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x107f): undefined reference to `pow'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x10f2): undefined reference to `pow'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x116f): undefined reference to `pow'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x12a8): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x12e9): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x1333): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x1364): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x13c5): undefined reference to `sqrt'
calc_time_stamp.o:calc_time_stamp.c:(.text+0x144e): more undefined references to `sqrt' follow
collect2: ld gab 1 als Ende-Status zurück
chmod: Ungültige Option -- l
„chmod --help" gibt weitere Informationen.
make: *** [extract_timestamps] Fehler 1
输出窗口：
gcc -lm -o extract_timestamps.exe basic_analysis.c calc_time_stamp.c collection.c extract_timestamps.c filename_treatment.c get_timestamps.c injection_statistics.c peak_finding.c read_lecroy_file.c read_tek_file.c save_timestamps.c stamp_handling.c treat_lecroy_file.c treat_tek_file.c -O3
filename_treatment.c: In Funktion »separate_filename«:
filename_treatment.c:23:26: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strrchr« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:25:7: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:28:11: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strlen« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:32:5: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strncpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:36:11: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strlen« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:40:5: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strncpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c: In Funktion »make_tek_header_filename«:
filename_treatment.c:73:13: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strlen« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:75:3: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:77:20: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strrchr« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:80:7: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:90:6: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:100:8: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
filename_treatment.c:104:8: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_lecroy_file.c: In Funktion »read_lecroy_header«:
read_lecroy_file.c:55:6: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strlen« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_lecroy_file.c:59:3: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_lecroy_file.c:69:3: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_lecroy_file.c:134:8: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strncpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_lecroy_file.c: In Funktion »read_lecroy_data«:
read_lecroy_file.c:153:3: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_lecroy_file.c:154:3: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_tek_file.c: In Funktion »read_tek_header«:
read_tek_file.c:67:7: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcpy« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_tek_file.c:70:11: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
read_tek_file.c:73:7: Warnung: Unverträgliche implizite Deklaration der eingebauten Funktion »strcat« [standardmäßig aktiviert]
编辑：
执行Windows / Linux版的可执行问题是，我使用的窗口，使文件作为输入文件的列表。该方案得到了文件名的简单列表进行搜索。不过，C不喜欢\\ r \\ n，但只有\\ n，所以它得到了对数字和文件名随机somwhere拖尾\\ r。
在Windows的makefile工作和Linux的makefile文件已经过时，有文件的顺序错误等。
The problem for executing windows/linux executable was that I used windows to make a list of files as input-file. THe program got a simple list of filenames to search through. However, C don't like the \r\n, but only \n, so it got on random somwhere a tailing \r on numbers and filenames. The Windows makefile is working and the linux-makefile was outdated and has the wrong order of files etc.
推荐答案
您的Linux 的Makefile 是错误的（它通过 -lm 到搭配chmod 命令，但 -lm 应的最后一个参数的链接<$ C $传递C> GCC 命令）。还记得程序参数是为了 GCC 相当重要的。
Your Linux Makefile is wrong (it passes -lm to a chmod command but -lmshould be passed as the last argument to the linking gcc command). Remember that order of program arguments to gcc matters a lot.
你并不真的需要一个搭配chmod 命令，如果你做了它应该在的独立的行您的Makefile
You don't really need a chmod command, and if you did it should be on a separate line of your Makefile
您应该运行使-p 一次，以了解什么是由知内置的规则使得。
You should run make -p once to understand what are the builtin rules known by make.
试着这么做
CC= gcc
CFLAGS= -g -Wall
LDLIBS= -lm
SOURCES= extract_timestamps.c filename_treatment.c basic_analysis.c \
collection.c read_lecroy_file.c read_tek_file.c \
stamp_handling.c treat_lecroy_file.c treat_tek_file.c \
save_timestamps.c injection_statistics.c calc_time_stamp.c \
peak_finding.c get_timestamps.c
OBJECTS= $(patsubst %.c, %.o, $(SOURCES))
.PHONY: all clean
all: extract_timestamps
extract_timestamps: $(OBJECTS)
$(LINK.c) $^ $(LOADLIBES) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
## add or autogenerate rules for object files.
由一个单一的<大骨节病>标签在适当的时候替换多个空格上述字符。
以上的Makefile 仍是不完整的。你需要去完成它（和你想有一个在干净目标）。请参见这个例子。您可能需要：
The above Makefile is still incomplete. You'll need to complete it (and you want a clean target in it). See this example. You might need:
%.o: %.c time_ext.h
顺便说一句，我不建议你的情况使用类似 cmake的 A 的Makefile 发电机。你的程序是很简单的通过一个简单的建的Makefile
BTW, I don't recommend using a Makefile generator like cmake in your case. Your program is simple enough to be built by a plain Makefile
和编译直通的GUI是（在的Emacs你可以尝试）的坏习惯：图形用户界面工具正在运行的命令建立你的程序，这是他们躲在你。因此，当某样东西错了，你变得无助。熟悉Linux的命令，他们是非常有帮助！的Mx编译
And compiling thru a GUI is a bad habit (you might try M-x compile in emacs): the GUI tool is running commands to build your program, and it is hiding them to you. So when something gets wrong you become helpless. Become familiar with Linux commands, they are very helpful!
您Windows和Linux的可执行程序之间的不同的行为（为同一来源$ C $ C）可以有很多理由：的未定义行为，实施浮点 -the实施不同的方式不仅取决于处理器，而操作系统dependent-，不同的 X86调用约定的，不同的编译器版本。写作便携式 code是一个艰难的艺术。
The different behavior between your Windows and your Linux executables (for the same source code) can have a lot of reasons: undefined behavior, different ways of implementing floating point -the implementation is not only processor dependent, but OS dependent-, different x86 calling conventions, different compiler versions. Writing portable code is a difficult art.
改善你的code，直到你没有从编译器警告和没有错误（例如，用的gcc -Wall ）
Improve your code till you get no warnings and no errors from the compiler (e.g. with gcc -Wall)
这篇关于在Win8的Makefile文件编译/ Ubuntu的行为会有所不同？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
查看全文
