不要在x86 / x64芯片仍使用微程序？ [英] Do x86/x64 chips still use microprogramming?

问题描述

如果我理解这两篇文章中，英特尔架构，在它的最低水平，已转换，而不是传统的CISC指令集，英特尔是众所周知的，使用RISC指令，：

If I understand these two articles, the Intel architecture, at it's lowest level, has transitioned to using RISC instructions, instead of the the traditional CISC instruction set that Intel is known for:

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/235/4

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel,264- 6.html

如果是这样的话，那是在x86 / x64芯片还是微程序或不会使用硬连接控制像传统的RISC芯片？我会猜测它还是微程序，但要核查。

If that's the case, then are x86/x64 chips still microprogrammed or does it use hardwired control like traditional RISC chips? I'm going to guess it's still microprogrammed but wanted to verify.

推荐答案

微code已经存在了很长一段时间，如果这就是你指的是什么。所以，我不知道HardwareSecrets文章是关于什么的，除非英特尔现正兴建RISC处理器上的CISC处理器之上。

Microcode has been around for a long time, if that's what you're referring to. So I don't know what the HardwareSecrets article is on about, unless Intel is now building RISC processors on top of CISC processors.

即使HardwareSecrets文章称他们微指令。土豆，potahto。

Even the HardwareSecrets article calls them Micro-Instructions. Potato, potahto.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro$c$c

这篇关于不要在x86 / x64芯片仍使用微程序？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！