为什么没有动作有无＆QUOT;仿制药＆QUOT;？ [英] Why doesn't ActionScript have "generics"?

问题描述

谁能告诉我，为什么ActionScript 3的，静态类型语言，不具备仿制药？是不是太辛苦了？的历史的东西吗？是否有某种方式为假这是我还没有发现罢了？

Can anyone tell me why ActionScript 3, a statically typed language, doesn't have generics? Is it too much work? A historical thing? Is there some way to "fake" it that I haven't picked up yet?

修改的：非常感谢你的答案！该向量类基本上是我一直在寻找，其他资料也有帮助。

Edit: thanks a lot for the answers! The Vector class is basically what I was looking for, and the other information was helpful too.

推荐答案

新矢量类是仿制药的一种形式，它的ActionScript 3现在支持编译时为Flash Player 10，他们不支持自己的泛型类的规范，但。

The new Vector class is a form of generics that Actionscript 3 now supports when compiled for Flash Player 10. They don't support the specification of your own generic classes, yet.

我认为Adobe将最终实施ES4标准。这将是很好，如果他们有谁能够更快地推动他们在正确的方向上的竞争对手。我期待从更新多一点AS3时他们搬到了CS4，但我想革命的向量类必须足够了。

I think Adobe will implement the ES4 standard eventually. It would be nice if they had a competitor who could push them quicker in the right direction. I was expecting a little more from the updates to AS3 when they moved to CS4, but I suppose the revolutionary Vector class will have to suffice.

看起来他们花了很多时间催谷的库Flex和AIR，也许他们会回去以后提高语言的支持，但它可能不是一个真正的优先事项。请记住，Adobe是在它的钱，而不是让最甜美的可能语言的感觉很好。

It looks like they spent a lot of time beefing up the libraries for Flex and AIR, so maybe they'll go back to improving the language support later, but it probably isn't a real priority. Remember, Adobe is in it for the money, not for the feel good of making the sweetest possible language.

这篇关于为什么没有动作有无＆QUOT;仿制药＆QUOT;？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！