Redis的serviceStack池连接客户端 [英] Redis serviceStack pooled connection client

问题描述

我设计它使用Redis的作为数据库的Web服务，我想知道使用Redis的与StackService客户端连接的最佳实践。

I'm designing a web service which uses Redis as a database, and I want to know the best practices for using Redis connecting with StackService client.

点是，我一直在阅读有关Redis的，我发现，与服务器交互的最佳方法是使用一个单一的并发连接。

The point is that I've been reading about Redis and I found that the best way to interact with the server is by using a single concurrent connection.

现在的问题是，尽管我M使用的 PooledRedisClientManager 每一个网络客户端向web服务，我得到一个更多的客户（开连接）Redis的服务器提出请求，这个数字连接的客户端增加无限制消耗更多的时间以及更多的内存

The problem is that despite I'm using PooledRedisClientManager each time that a web client makes a request to the web service I get a one more connected client (opened connection) to the redis server and this number of connected client increases without limit consuming more and more memory.

样品'故障'代码：

PooledRedisClientManager pooledClientManager = new PooledRedisClientManager("localhost");
var redisClient = pooledClientManager.GetClient();
using (redisClient)
{
   redisClient.Set("key1", "value1");
}

我没有什么要解决的问题，就是创建实现Singleton模式的类使用静态 RedisClient VAR;这意味着，如果在 redisClient 未初始化创建一个新的，如果是，则返回初始化之一。

What I did to solve the problem, is create a class implementing the singleton pattern with a static RedisClient var; Which if the redisClient is not initialized creates a new one, and if it is, returns the initialized one.

解决方案：

public class CustomRedisPooledClient
{
    private static CustomRedisPooledClient _instance = null;
    public RedisClient redisClient = null;

    // Objeto sincronización para hacer el Lock 
    private static object syncLock = new object();

    private CustomRedisPooledClient()
    {
        redisClient = new RedisClient("localhost");
    }

    public static CustomRedisPooledClient GetPooledClient()
    {
        if (_instance == null)
        {
            lock (syncLock)
            {
                if (_instance == null)
                {
                    _instance = new CustomRedisPooledClient();
                }
            }
        }
        return _instance;
    }
}

CustomRedisPooledClient customRedisPooledClient = CustomRedisPooledClient.GetPooledClient();
using (customRedisPooledClient.redisClient)
{
    customRedisPooledClient.redisClient.Set("key1", "value1");
}

这是一个好的做法呢？

感谢你在前进！

推荐答案

我用 PooledRedisClientManager 和正常工作：

示例代码的我只运行一次

static PooledRedisClientManager pooledClientManager = new PooledRedisClientManager("localhost");

和代码，我在许多线程运行：

and code I run on many threads:

var redisClient = pooledClientManager.GetClient();
using (redisClient)
{
    redisClient.Set("key" + i.ToString(), "value1");
}

和我只有11客户端连接到服务器。

and I have only 11 clients connected to the server.

这篇关于Redis的serviceStack池连接客户端的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！