解析HTML：成人分类系统 [英] Parsing HTML: Adult Classification Systems

问题描述

我是研究在网络上使用的不同和（有时过时）评级/分类标准。即 PICS ，的粉末， ICRA

I'm research the different and (sometimes obsolete) Ratings/Classification standards used on the web. i.e. PICS, POWDER, ICRA

哪个标准（使用它的站点数）最流行？

Which standard is the most popular (number of sites using it)?

有一个C＃库，将处理的任何（或全部）这些？

Is there a C# library which will handle any (or all) of these?

推荐答案

您不应该使用 PICS 了。从 http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/ ：

粉已经取代了PICS为描述Web站点和上这样描述行事建筑应用的推荐方法。 PICS和粉末的比较可以分别的。

POWDER has superseded PICS as the recommended method for describing Web sites and building applications that act on such descriptions. A comparison of PICS and POWDER is available separately.

在链接的文档，你可以阅读：

In the linked document you can read:

这意味着，W3C不建议使用的PICS，用于由粉末它提供显著优点如下详述涵盖的用例的软件的任何进一步的发展。

This means that W3C does not recommend any further development of software that uses PICS, the use cases for which are covered by POWDER which offers significant advantages as detailed below.

ICRA 已经停产：

截至2010年10月，ICRA标注引擎已被FOSI停产。此外，FOSI已撤回了ICRA评级系统都支持，并采取下与ICRA评级标签网站上的所有文档。原因是ICRA的标签没有获得广泛的接受。

As of October 2010, the ICRA labeling engine has been discontinued by FOSI. Additionally, FOSI has withdrawn all support for the ICRA rating system and taken down all documentation for labeling websites with ICRA ratings. The reason is the ICRA label failed to gain widespread acceptance.

所以， ，我们应该使用粉。

---

So, we should use POWDER.

然而，粉末只是框架，所以你仍然需要一个分类（相应地，一个RDF词汇）的内容分级，您可以用粉末用途。粉末底漆包括使用ICRA词汇，FWIW的例子。

However, POWDER is only framework, so you’d still need a classification (resp. a RDF vocabulary) for content rating which you could use with POWDER. The POWDER Primer includes an example using the ICRA vocabulary, FWIW.

请参阅相关的问题：是否有任何替代ICRA为自我调节的内容标签网站？

这篇关于解析HTML：成人分类系统的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！