造型继承使用Ruby / Rails的奥姆斯 [英] Modeling inheritance with Ruby/Rails ORMs
问题描述
我想这个继承模型的一个简单的博客系统
I'm trying to model this inheritance for a simple blog system
博客有很多条目
,但他们可能会在他们的性质不同。我不想博客表模型,我关心的是有关的条目:
Blog has many Entries
, but they may be different in their nature. I don't want to model the Blog table, my concern is about the entries:
- 在简单的条目是
文章
,有标题
和文本
-
引用
,但是,没有一个标题和短文本
-
传媒
有一个网址
和评论
。 .. - 等等...
- simplest entry is an
Article
that hastitle
andtext
Quote
, however, does not have a title and has shorttext
Media
has aurl
and acomment
...- etc...
什么是正确的方法来模拟这种使用Ruby on Rails的?这就是
What is a proper way to model this with Ruby on Rails? That is
- 我应该使用ActiverRecord这个或切换到DataMapper的?
- 我想,以避免有很多空单元格的一大桌的做法
当我将数据拆分成输入
+ 的PostData code>,
QuoteData code>等我可以有
类?这将是标准的方式来做到这一点的SQL和 belongs_to的:进入
在这些DATAS,而无需在<$ C HAS_ONE ???
$ C>输入 entry.post_data code>可以通过
表。 entry_id
在<$得到解决C $ C> POSTDATA
When I split the data into Entry
+ PostData
, QuoteData
etc can I have belongs_to :entry
in these Datas without having has_one ???
in the Entry
class? That would be standard way to do it in sql and entry.post_data
may be resolved by the entry_id
in the postdata
table.
编辑:我不想博客表模型,我能做到这一点,我关心的是有关条目以及如何将继承映射表(S)
I don't want to model the Blog table, I can do that, my concern is about the entries and how would the inheritance be mapped to the table(s).
推荐答案
我已经遇到这个数据的问题几次,并尝试了一些不同的策略。我想一个我的忠实粉丝,是所提到的cicloon的STI的方法。请确保您有一个键入
列在你的项目表。
I've come across this data problem several times and have tried a few different strategies. I think the one I'm a biggest fan of, is the STI approach as mentioned by cicloon. Make sure you have a type
column on your entry table.
class Blog < ActiveRecord::Base
# this is your generic association that would return all types of entries
has_many :entries
# you can also add other associations specific to each type.
# through STI, rails is aware that a media_entry is in fact an Entry
# and will do most of the work for you. These will automatically do what cicloon.
# did manually via his methods.
has_many :articles
has_many :quotes
has_many :media
end
class Entry < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Article < Entry
has_one :article_data
end
class Quote < Entry
has_one :quote_data
end
class Media < Entry
has_one :media_data
end
class ArticleData < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :article # smart enough to know this is actually an entry
end
class QuoteData < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :quote
end
class MediaData < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :media
end
我喜欢这种方法的东西,是可以保持的通用输入数据的入门车型。摘要任何子条目类型的数据到自己的数据表,并有HAS_ONE协会给他们,从而对您的输入表中增加额外的列。它也工作得很好,当你做你的观点的:
The thing I like about this approach, is you can keep the generic Entry data in the entry model. Abstract out any of the sub-entry type data into their own data tables, and have a has_one association to them, resulting in no extra columns on your entries table. It also works very well for when you're doing your views:
app/views/articles/_article.html.erb
app/views/quotes/_quote.html.erb
app/views/media/_media.html.erb # may be medium here....
和从你的观点,你可以做两种:
and from your views you can do either:
<%= render @blog.entries %> <!-- this will automatically render the appropriate view partial -->
或有更多的控制:
or have more control:
<%= render @blog.quotes %>
<%= render @blog.articles %>
您可以找到的产生形成了一个pretty的通用方式,以及,我通常会呈现一个输入/ _form.html.erb
部分通用输入字段。在那个部分,我也有一个
You can find a pretty generic way of generating forms as well, I usually render the generic entry fields in an entries/_form.html.erb
partial. Inside that partial, I also have a
<%= form_for @entry do |f| %>
<%= render :partial => "#{f.object.class.name.tableize}/#{f.object.class.name.underscore}_form", :object => f %>
<% end %>
类型呈现为子表单数据。反过来子窗体可以使用 accepts_nested_attributes_for
+ fields_for
打通正确传递的数据。
type render for the sub form data. The sub forms in turn can use accepts_nested_attributes_for
+ fields_for
to get the data passed through properly.
唯一的痛苦,我有这样的做法,是如何处理的控制器和路线佣工。由于每一项都是它自己的类型的,你要么必须创建自定义的控制器/为每个类型的路由(你可能想要这个...),或使通用的。如果你把通用的方法,有两件事要记住。
The only pain I have with this approach, is how to handle the controllers and route helpers. Since each entry is of its own type, you'll either have to create custom controllers / routes for each type (you may want this...) or make a generic one. If you take the generic approach, two things to remember.
1)你不能设置一个:通过更新类型
字段属性,您的控制器将有实例相应的 Article.new
来保存它(您可以使用此工厂)。
1) You can't set a :type
field through update attributes, your controller will have to instantiate the appropriate Article.new
to save it (you may use a factory here).
2)你必须使用成为()
办法( @ article.becomes(输入)
),以与条目作为条目,而不是一个子类的工作。
2) You'll have to use the becomes()
method (@article.becomes(Entry)
) to work with the entry as an Entry and not a subclass.
希望这有助于。
警告,我已经实际使用媒体作为过去一个型号名称。在我的情况下,它导致了一个名为然而,在轨媒体2.3.x导轨中3台,它希望我的模型被命名为中型和我同桌的媒体。您可能需要添加自定义的拐点在这个命名,虽然我不知道。
这篇关于造型继承使用Ruby / Rails的奥姆斯的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!