在sem_post(sem_t * sem)和sem_wait(sem_t * sem)周围是否有完整的内存屏障? [英] Is there a full memory barrier around sem_post(sem_t * sem) and sem_wait(sem_t * sem)?

查看:870
本文介绍了在sem_post(sem_t * sem)和sem_wait(sem_t * sem)周围是否有完整的内存屏障?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在linux代码中,
我记得在mutex_lock()周围有一个完整的内存屏障。
我想确认它是否在sem_xxx周围。

In linux code, I remember hearing there is a full memory barrier around mutex_lock(). I want to make sure whether it is around sem_xxx also.

推荐答案

是的,它使用原子递增/递减在无争议的情况下,当然有一个膜。对于有争议的情况,有一个系统调用futex,它也有一个membar。

Yes, it uses an atomic increment/decrement in the uncontended case, which of course has a membar. For the contended case there is a system call to futex, which also has a membar.

这篇关于在sem_post(sem_t * sem)和sem_wait(sem_t * sem)周围是否有完整的内存屏障?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆