如何区分开关,复选框值是由用户还是以编程方式(包括保留)更改? [英] How can I distinguish whether Switch,Checkbox Value is changed by user or programmatically (including by retention)?
问题描述
setOnCheckedChangeListener(new OnCheckedChangeListener(){
@Override
public void onCheckedChanged(CompoundButton buttonView,boolean isChecked){
//如何检查复选框/开关已经被用户检查了
//或者已经被编程检查了?
if(isNotSetByUser())
return;
handleSetbyUser
}
});
如何实现 isNotSetByUser()
?
回答2:
p>
使用OnClickListener而不是OnCheckedChangeListener
someCheckBox.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener ){
@Override
public void onClick(View v){
//您可能会保留对CheckBox的引用以避免此类转换
boolean checked = ((CheckBox)v).isChecked();
setSomeBoolean(checked);
}
}
现在,您只需选择点击事件,而不必担心程序化更改。
答案1:
我已经创建了一个包装类Pattern)以封装的方式处理这个问题:
public class BetterCheckBox extends CheckBox {
private CompoundButton.OnCheckedChangeListener myListener = null;
private CheckBox myCheckBox;
public BetterCheckBox(Context context){
super(context);
}
public BetterCheckBox(上下文上下文,CheckBox复选框){
this(context);
this.myCheckBox = checkBox;
}
//这里的分类构造函数...
@Override
public void setOnCheckedChangeListener(
CompoundButton.OnCheckedChangeListener listener){
if(listener!= null){
this.myListener = listener;
}
myCheckBox.setOnCheckedChangeListener(listener);
}
public void silentlySetChecked(boolean checked){
toggleListener(false);
myCheckBox.setChecked(checked);
toggleListener(true);
}
private void toggleListener(boolean on){
if(on){
this.setOnCheckedChangeListener(myListener);
}
else {
this.setOnCheckedChangeListener(null);
}
}
}
CheckBox仍然可以声明为同样在XML中,但在代码初始化GUI时使用这个:
BetterCheckBox myCheckBox;
//后来...
myCheckBox = new BetterCheckBox(context,
(CheckBox)view.findViewById(R.id.my_check_box));
如果要设置从代码检查而不触发侦听器,请调用 myCheckBox .silentlySetChecked(someBoolean)
而不是 setChecked
。
setOnCheckedChangeListener(new OnCheckedChangeListener() {
@Override
public void onCheckedChanged(CompoundButton buttonView, boolean isChecked) {
// How to check whether the checkbox/switch has been checked
// by user or it has been checked programatically ?
if (isNotSetByUser())
return;
handleSetbyUser();
}
});
How to implement method isNotSetByUser()
?
Answer 2:
A very simple answer:
Use on OnClickListener instead of OnCheckedChangeListener
someCheckBox.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener(){
@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
// you might keep a reference to the CheckBox to avoid this class cast
boolean checked = ((CheckBox)v).isChecked();
setSomeBoolean(checked);
}
});
Now you only pick up click events and don't have to worry about programmatic changes.
Answer 1:
I have created a wrapper class (see Decorator Pattern) which handles this problem in an encapsulated way:
public class BetterCheckBox extends CheckBox {
private CompoundButton.OnCheckedChangeListener myListener = null;
private CheckBox myCheckBox;
public BetterCheckBox(Context context) {
super(context);
}
public BetterCheckBox(Context context, CheckBox checkBox) {
this(context);
this.myCheckBox = checkBox;
}
// assorted constructors here...
@Override
public void setOnCheckedChangeListener(
CompoundButton.OnCheckedChangeListener listener){
if(listener != null) {
this.myListener = listener;
}
myCheckBox.setOnCheckedChangeListener(listener);
}
public void silentlySetChecked(boolean checked){
toggleListener(false);
myCheckBox.setChecked(checked);
toggleListener(true);
}
private void toggleListener(boolean on){
if(on) {
this.setOnCheckedChangeListener(myListener);
}
else {
this.setOnCheckedChangeListener(null);
}
}
}
CheckBox can still be declared the same in XML, but use this when initializing your GUI in code:
BetterCheckBox myCheckBox;
// later...
myCheckBox = new BetterCheckBox(context,
(CheckBox) view.findViewById(R.id.my_check_box));
If you want to set checked from code without triggering the listener, call myCheckBox.silentlySetChecked(someBoolean)
instead of setChecked
.
这篇关于如何区分开关,复选框值是由用户还是以编程方式(包括保留)更改?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!