noir vs compojure？ [英] noir vs compojure?

问题描述

我无法理解clojure的Noir库的问题。它似乎是一个写在compojure顶部的框架，重命名defroute到defpage，并调用它一天。显然是一个不公平的简化，但是诺伊尔到底是什么？为什么我使用Noir而不是纯compojure + hiccup？

I'm having trouble understanding the point of clojure's Noir library. It seems to be a framework written on top of compojure that renames defroute to defpage and calls it a day. Obviously an unfair simplification, but what exactly does Noir bring to the table? Why would I use Noir instead of plain compojure+hiccup?

编辑/更新：
Noir已过时，有趣的写在这里： http://blog.raynes.me/blog/2012/12/13/moving-away-from -noir / 。

推荐答案

Compojure是一个小框架，它生成Ring请求/响应处理程序，基于您定义的路由。

Compojure is a small framework that generates Ring request/response handlers, where handlers are chosen based on routes you define.

Noir增加了会话处理，cookie，模板和分支的功能，更简单的生成响应，表单验证，路由过滤器， JSON（解）序列化和自定义状态页。换句话说，Noir将Compojure，Hiccup和一些其他聪明的东西组合在一个包中。

Noir adds functionality for session handling, cookies, templates and partials, an easier way to generate responses, form validation, route filters, encrypted passwords, JSON (de-)serialising and custom status pages. In other words, Noir combines Compojure, Hiccup, and a bunch of other clever stuff in one package.

这篇关于noir vs compojure？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！