BOOL Obj-C 2属性的命名约定？ [英] Naming conventions for BOOL Obj-C 2 properties?

问题描述

我有一个readonly BOOL属性。这里是主要命名模式？

I have a readonly BOOL property. What is dominant naming pattern here?

背景：对于简单的方法声明，接受的模式

Background: for plain old method declarations, the accepted pattern

- (BOOL)isEditable;
- (void)setEditable:(BOOL)flag;

在@property世界中，通常表示为

In a @property world, that would typically be expressed as

@property(getter=isEditable) BOOL editable;

但是，有相反的例子。如CalStore / CalCalendar.h

However, there are examples to the contrary. Such as in CalStore/CalCalendar.h

@property(readonly) BOOL isEditable;

（CalCalendar在这里错误，或者也是只读BOOL属性的可接受命名模式？）

(Is CalCalendar wrong here, or is that the also an acceptable naming pattern for read-only BOOL properties?)

我有一个管理视图的控制器，它可能或不可以调整大小。该属性是只读属性。

I've got a controller which manages a view, which may or may not be resizable. The property is read only.

@property(readonly) BOOL viewIsResizable;
@property(readonly) BOOL isViewResizable;
@property(readonly, getter=isViewResizable) BOOL viewResizable;

哪种模式是最自然的还是类Cocoa的？

Which pattern is most natural or Cocoa-like?

推荐答案

引用自 ADC

如果属性表示为
形容词，格式为：

If the attribute is expressed as an adjective, the format is:

- (void)setAdjective:(BOOL)flag;
- (BOOL)isAdjective;

例如：

- (void)setEditable:(BOOL)flag;
- (BOOL)isEditable; 

如果属性表示为动词，格式为：

If the attribute is expressed as a verb, the format is:

- (void)setVerbObject:(BOOL)flag; 
- (BOOL)verbObject;

例如：

- (void)setShowsAlpha:(BOOL)flag;
- (BOOL)showsAlpha; 

动词应为简单现在时。

| K <

这篇关于BOOL Obj-C 2属性的命名约定？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！