有没有任何自我改进的编译器？ [英] Is there any self-improving compiler around?

问题描述

我不知道有任何自我改进的编译器，但我再也不是一个编译器家伙。

I am not aware of any self-improving compiler, but then again I am not much of a compiler-guy.

改进编译器？

请注意，我说的是一个改进自身的编译器。

Please note that I am talking about a compiler that improves itself - not a compiler that improves the code it compiles.

任何指针都赞赏！

注意：如果您想知道为什么我要求查看 this post 。即使我同意大多数的论点，我不太确定以下：

Side-note: in case you're wondering why I am asking have a look at this post. Even if I agree with most of the arguments I am not too sure about the following:

我们有程序可以提高
他们的代码没有人类输入现在 -
他们被称为编译器。

We have programs that can improve their code without human input now — they’re called compilers.

...因此我的问题。 >

... hence my question.

推荐答案

虽然编译器可以改进代码而没有人为干扰，但是，声称编译器是自我完善 。编译器所做的这些改进只是基于一组由人写的规则（cyborgs任何人？）。所以，你的问题的答案是：

While it is true that compilers can improve code without human interference, however, the claim that "compilers are self-improving" is rather dubious. These "improvements" that compilers make are merely based on a set of rules that are written by humans (cyborgs anyone?). So the answer to your question is : No.

在旁注，如果有什么像自我改进的编译器，我们知道...首先将改进语言，然后自己的代码，最后，它会修改其代码成为一个病毒，使所有的开发人员使用它...然后终于我们有一个经典的计算机对人类的最后希望 - 为人类的东西...所以......不。

On a side note, if there was anything like a self improving compiler, we'd know... first the thing would improve the language, then its own code and finally, it would modify its code to become a virus and make all developers use it... and then finally we'd have one of those classic computer-versus-humans-last-hope-for-humanity kind of things... so ... No.

这篇关于有没有任何自我改进的编译器？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！