OCaml内部:异常 [英] OCaml internals: Exceptions

查看:147
本文介绍了OCaml内部:异常的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我很想知道如何在OCaml运行时处理异常,使它们如此轻量级。他们使用setjmp / longjmp还是在每个函数中返回一个特殊的值,并传播它?



在我看来,longjmp会给系统带来一些压力,但只有当引发异常时,检查每个函数返回值需要检查每个和每个值调用一个函数后,这似乎在我看来会做很多检查和跳转,似乎它会执行最糟糕的。



通过查看OCaml如何与C接口( http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual032.html#toc142 ),并查看callback.h,似乎一个异常被标记为使用对象的存储器对齐(#define Is_exception_result(v)(((v)& 3)== 2))。这似乎表明它的实现不使用longjmp并且在每个函数调用之后检查每个函数结果。是吗?或者C函数已经尝试捕获任何异常,然后将其转换为此格式?



谢谢!

解决方案

OCaml异常处理



不使用 setjmp / longjmp 。当 try< expr>在评估< handle> 时,在堆栈上放置陷阱,其包含关于处理程序的信息。最上面的陷阱的地址保存在寄存器1中,当你提高时,它直接跳到这个陷阱,一次释放几个堆栈帧(这比检查每个返回码更好)。



¹:或者全局,在没有足够寄存器的体系结构上

p>

您可以在代码中看到自己:





setjmp

的比较

ocaml使用具有很少或没有被调用保存的寄存器的非标准调用约定,这使得(和尾递归)有效。我想(但我不是专家),这就是为什么C longjmp / setjmp 在大多数架构上不是那么高效。请参见
此x86_64 setjmp实现,它看起来完全像以前的陷阱机制加callee寄存器保存。



这在 C / OCaml接口:从C代码调用Caml函数的常用方法, caml_callback ,不捕获OCaml-land异常;您必须使用特定的 caml_callback_exn (如果您希望设置其陷阱处理程序保存/恢复被调用者保存的C调用约定的寄存器。参见例如。 amd64代码,保存寄存器,然后跳转到此标签以设置异常陷阱。


I'm curious to know how exceptions are dealt with in OCaml runtime to make them so lightweight. Do they use setjmp/longjmp or do they return a special value in each function, and propagate it?

It seems to me that longjmp would put a little strain on the system, but only when an exception is raised, while checking for each function return value would need to check for every and each value after calling a function, which seems to me would put a lot of checks and jumps, and it seems it would perform worst.

By looking at how OCaml interfaces with C ( http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual032.html#toc142 ), and looking at callback.h, it seems that an exception is tagged by using the memory alignment of objects ( #define Is_exception_result(v) (((v) & 3) == 2) ). This seems to indicate that its implementation doesn't use longjmp and checks each function result after each function call. Is that it? Or the C function already tries to catch any exception, and then converts it to this format?

Thank you!

解决方案

OCaml exception handling

It doesn't use setjmp/longjmp. When a try <expr> with <handle> is evaluated, a "trap" is placed on the stack, that contains information about the handler. The address of the topmost trap is kept in a register¹, and when you raise, it jumps directly to this trap, unwinding several stack frames in one go (this is better than checking each return code). A trap also stores the address of the previous trap, which is restored in the register at raise time.

¹: or a global, on architectures with not enough registers

You can see for yourself in the code:

  • bytecode compilation: lines 635-641, two Kpushtrap/Kpoptrap bytecodes surround the try..withed expression
  • native compilation: lines 254-260, again instructions Lpushtrap/Lpoptrap around the expression
  • bytecode execution for the bytecode PUSHTRAP (places the trap/handler), POPTRAP (remove it, non-error case) and RAISE (jump to the trap)
  • native code emission on mips and on amd64 (for example)

Comparison with setjmp

Ocaml uses a non-standard calling convention with few or no callee-saved registers, which makes this (and tail-recursion) efficient. I suppose (but I'm no expert) that's the reason why C longjmp/setjmp isn't as efficient on most architectures. See for example this x86_64 setjmp implementation that looks exactly like the previous trapping mechanism plus callee-registers save.

This is taken into account in the C/OCaml interface: the usual way to call a Caml function from C code, caml_callback, doesn't catch OCaml-land exceptions; you have to use a specific caml_callback_exn if you wish to, which setups its trap handler and saves/restores callee-saved registers of the C calling convention. See eg. the amd64 code, which saves the registers then jump to this label to setup the exception trap.

这篇关于OCaml内部:异常的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆