您选择的跨浏览器的JavaScript GUI [英] Your choice of cross-browser javascript GUI

问题描述

UPDATE - 从2015年2月起更新的全面比较可以在这里找到：

Ext JS常见问题

---

2008问题：

有许多伟大而不那么伟大的JavaScript GUI框架。我看了一些（只表面）。

滚动到此问题的末尾，看看别人说什么

• Ext.js 很多人最明显的选择，因为它是最知名的框架之一。
  
  优点： 真棒，大型社群，大量扩充功能/外挂程式，GPL'ed
  
  Disadvanatges：无法使用第三方扩充功能（




• Backbase 相对不太清楚。一个奇怪的XML和Javascript的混合，让人想起XUL。但是，它已经是跨浏览器
  
  优点： 好，非常可扩展，允许轻松整合一些非常整洁的东西
  
  缺点：定价陡峭，有CPU限制（虽然可以免费使用多达2个CPU） ，




• qooxdoo 也很受欢迎。
  
  优点： 请填写
  
  




• YUI 填写说明
  
  优点：组织良好的代码
  缺点： / em>




• Dojo 填写说明
  
  优点：增量加载类
  
  缺点：感觉feel肿




• jQuery UI
  
  优点：小工具不彼此依赖
  
  缺点：在开发的早期阶段，非常少的小部件
  
  可能出现更广泛接受的趋势： jQuery将随ASP.NET MVC一起提供

---

你说什么？你使用什么，为什么？你宁愿使用什么，为什么？在任何类型的项目中

---

要使用输入更新...

查看此优秀评论从Sergey Ilinsky，这解释了非常好的框架，你应该选择当你想只是pimp你的页面，构建一个丰富的前端（有几个选择，不少）的应用程序

另一个线程中有趣的评论比较了jQuery，Dojo，Prototype，Mootools， Sproutcore 和 Cappuccino （问题已移除）。

blockquote>

解决方案

当考虑使用JavaScript库/框架时，应该首先定义你的目标。我习惯于按照其目的和架构将所有JavaScript库/框架分成三个类别：

1. 我想要<我的网页有一些真正酷的功能。

>

2. old：Prototype，Mootools




3. 强>具有丰富的前端。我喜欢用JavaScript定义UI，我不介意使用这些库的自定义API来编写我的应用程序逻辑。转到JavaScript

   。
   
   
   
   
   
   • extjs
   
   
   
   
   • DHTMLX
   $ b $ b
   • Dojo
   
   
   • YUI
   
   
   • Qooxdoo
   
   
   • jQuery UI
   
   
   • Bindows - 生成Windows的确切外观
   
   
   • Spry （raw，遭受严重的内存泄漏）
   
   



4. 我想用构建应用程序丰富的前端。我喜欢在XML中定义UI，我想用标准API编写我的应用程序逻辑，并利用其他面向开发人员的标准技术。转到 。 rel =nofollow noreferrer> Sproutcore



5. Backbase


6. 充足的SDK

/ li>

有关详细比较，请参阅 ExtJS的替代品。

UPDATE - A comprehensive comparison, updated as of February 2015, can be found here:

Alternatives to Ext JS

---

2008 question:

There are a number of great and not so-great Javascript GUI frameworks out there. I've looked at some (only superficially). And I can't make my mind about any of them

Scroll to the end of this question to see what others say

• Ext.js The obvious choice by many since it's one of the most known frameworks.
  Advantages: Looks awesome, large community, lots of extensions/plugins, GPL'ed
  Disadvanatges: Inability to use third-party extensions with commercial license (and some of those extensions have killer features)

• Backbase Relatively less known. A curious mix of XML and Javascript that is reminiscent of XUL. However, it's already cross-browser
  Advantages: Looks good, very extensible, allows easy incorporation of some really neat stuff
  Disadvantages: Pricing is steep and CPU-bound (though free to use on up to 2 CPUs), forums are slow to respond (though commercial support is supposedly fast)

• qooxdoo Also very popular.
  Advantages: Please, fill in
  Disadvantages: Code is slighly messy (based on hearsay)

• YUI Fill in description
  Advantages: Well organized code Disadvantages: Many widgets still in beta

• Dojo Fill in description
  Advantages: Incremental loading of classes
  Disadvantages: MIght feel bloated

• jQuery UI
  Advantages: Widgets not dependent on each other
  Disadvantages: In an early stage of development, very few widgets
  Possible tendency towards wider acception: jQuery to be shipped with ASP.NET MVC

---

What say you? What do you use and why? What would you rather use and why? In any kind of project

---

To be updated with your input...

See this excellent comment from Sergey Ilinsky which explains very nicely which framework you should choose when you want to just pimp up your page, build an application with a rich frontend (with several choices, no less)

An interesting comment in another thread compares jQuery, Dojo, Prototype, Mootools, Sproutcore and Cappuccino (the question was removed).

解决方案

When considering a JavaScript library/framework for usage you should first define on your goals. I used to separate all JavaScript libraries/frameworks into three categories by their purpose and architecture:

1. I want to pimp up my page with some really "cool" features. Go for JavaScript library.

   • jQuery
   • ZenoUI
   • old: Prototype, Mootools

2. I want to build an application with a rich front-end. I like defining UI with JavaScript and I do not mind much using custom APIs of these libraries for coding my application logic. Go for JavaScript post-library/pre-framework.

   • extjs
   • kendo
   • DHTMLX
   • Dojo
   • YUI
   • Qooxdoo
   • jQuery UI
   • Bindows - generates the exact look of Windows
   • Spry (raw, suffers severely of memory leaks)

3. I want to build an application with a rich front-end. I like defining UI in XML and I would like to code my application logic against standard APIs and make use of other developer-facing standard-based technologies. Go for JavaScript framework.

   • Sproutcore
   • Backbase
   • Ample SDK

For a more detailed comparison, see the alternatives to ExtJS.

这篇关于您选择的跨浏览器的JavaScript GUI的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！