行高,字体大小和段落边距之间的理想关系是什么? [英] What's the ideal relationship between line-height, font-size, and paragraph margin?

查看:214
本文介绍了行高,字体大小和段落边距之间的理想关系是什么?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

很长一段时间,我注意到调整 line-height 并在段落之间添加一些额外的空格,相对于所选的 font-size 可以对网站内容的可读性产生巨大的影响,但到目前为止,我一直为这些属性选择临时值。



在排版,出版或心理学文献中有关于如何调整这些属性相对于彼此的值的任何建议吗?

解决方案

我不能发布详细的答案,恐怕,但我建议您阅读 Tim Brown 的文章更有意义的排版,位于 List Apart ,作为指导。



实质上,文字块的宽度('measure')应该在50-60个字符左右, line-height 设置为 1.5 (不带单位,无论用于设置 font-size 的单位), font-size b
$ b

字符本身似乎设置在16px标记周围,但Tim建议使用比例,例如 Golden Ratio 来定义标题,正文,标题等的相对字体大小。


For a long time I've noticed that adjusting line-height and adding some extra space between paragraphs both relative to the chosen font-size can make a huge impact on the readability of Web site content, but so far I have always selected ad-hoc values for these attributes.

Are there any recommendations in typography, publishing, or psychology literature for how to adjust values for these properties relative to each other?

解决方案

I can't post a detailed answer, I'm afraid, but I'd suggest that you read Tim Brown's article 'More Meaningful Typography', at A List Apart, for guidance.

In essence, it seems that the width ('measure') of a block of text should be around 50-60 characters, the line-height set at 1.5 (without a unit, which will be 1.5 times the font-size, regardless of the units used to set the font-size).

Characters themselves seem to be set around the 16px mark, but Tim suggests using a scale, such as that represented by the Golden Ratio to define the relative font-sizing of headings, body text, captions and so forth.

这篇关于行高,字体大小和段落边距之间的理想关系是什么?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆