Grails命令对象数据绑定 [英] Grails command object data binding

查看:178
本文介绍了Grails命令对象数据绑定的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

Grails已将请求参数绑定到域对象,并将其关联。这主要取决于检测以 .id 结尾的请求参数,并自动从数据库加载。

Grails has very good support for binding request parameters to a domain object and it's associations. This largely relies on detecting request parameters that end with .id and automatically loading those from the database.

但是,不清楚如何填充命令对象的关联。以下示例:

However, it's not clear how to populate the associations of a command object. Take the following example:

class ProductCommand {

    String name
    Collection<AttributeTypeCommand> attributeTypes 
    ProductTypeCommand productType
}

此对象具有单端关联 ProductTypeCommand 和与 AttributeTypeCommand 的多端关联。所有属性类型和产品类型的列表都可以从该接口的实现获得。

This object has a single-ended association with ProductTypeCommand and a many-ended association with AttributeTypeCommand. The list of all attribute types and product types are available from an implementation of this interface

interface ProductAdminService {
    Collection<AttributeTypeCommand> listAttributeTypes();
    Collection<ProductTypeCommand> getProductTypes();
}

我使用这个界面在GSP中填充产品和属性类型选择列表。我也依赖 - 将此接口注入到命令对象中,并使用它来模拟 attributeTypes productType 属性命令对象

I use this interface to populate the product and attribute type selection lists in a GSP. I also dependency-inject this interface into the command object, and use it to "simulate" attributeTypes and productType properties on the command object

class ProductCommand {

    ProductAdminService productAdminService

    String name   

    List<Integer> attributeTypeIds = []
    Integer productTypeId

    void setProductType(ProductTypeCommand productType) {
        this.productTypeId = productType.id
    }

    ProductTypeCommand getProductType() {
        productAdminService.productTypes.find {it.id == productTypeId}        
    }

    Collection<AttributeTypeCommand> getAttributeTypes() {

        attributeTypeIds.collect {id ->
            productAdminService.getAttributeType(id)
        }
    }

    void setAttributeTypes(Collection<AttributeTypeCommand> attributeTypes) {
        this.attributeTypeIds = attributeTypes.collect {it.id}
    }
}

实际发生的是, code> attributeTypeIds 和 productTypeId 属性绑定到相关的请求参数,getters / setterssimulate productType attributeTypes 属性。有一个更简单的方法来填充命令对象的关联?

What actually happens is that the attributeTypeIds and productTypeId properties are bound to the relevant request parameters and the getters/setters "simulate" productType and attributeTypes properties. Is there a simpler way to populate the associations of a command object?

推荐答案

您是否真的需要为attributeTypes和productType属性设置子命令?任何你不使用PropertyEditorSupport绑定的原因?例如:

Do you actually need to have sub-commands for attributeTypes and productType properties? Any reason you're not using PropertyEditorSupport binding? E.g.:

public class ProductTypeEditor extends PropertyEditorSupport
{
    ProductAdminService productAdminService // inject somewhow
    void setAsText(String s)
    {
        if (s) value = productAdminService.productTypes.find { it.id == s.toLong() }
    }

    public String getAsText()
    {
        value?.id        
    }
}

(和attributeType对象类似),并在编辑器注册商中注册:

(and something similar for attributeType object), and register these in a editor registrar:

import java.beans.PropertyEditorSupport
public class CustomEditorRegistrar implements PropertyEditorRegistrar {
    public void registerCustomEditors(PropertyEditorRegistry reg) {
        reg.registerCustomEditor(ProductType, new ProductTypeEditor())
        reg.registerCustomEditor(AttributeType, new AttributeTypeEditor())
    }
}

资源oovy:

beans =
{
    customEditorRegistrar(CustomEditorRegistrar)
}

然后在您刚刚拥有的Cmd中:

then in your Cmd you just have:

class ProductCommand {
    String name
    List<AttributeType> attributeTypes = []
    ProductType productType
}

如果您 需要实际的子命令关联,那么我已经做了类似于@Andre Steingress的建议,结合PropertyEditorSupport绑定:

If you do need actual sub-command associations then I've done something similar to what @Andre Steingress has suggested, in combination with PropertyEditorSupport binding:

// parent cmd
import org.apache.commons.collections.ListUtils
import org.apache.commons.collections.FactoryUtils
public class DefineItemConstraintsCmd implements Serializable
{
    List allItemConstraints = ListUtils.lazyList([], FactoryUtils.instantiateFactory(ItemConstraintsCmd))
    //...
}    
// sub cmd
@Validateable
class ItemConstraintsCmd implements Serializable
{
    Item item // this has an ItemEditor for binding
    //...
}

希望我没有误解你想要实现的目标:)

Hopefully I've not misunderstood what you're trying to achieve :)

这篇关于Grails命令对象数据绑定的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆