Maven：我应该保留还是删除也是传递依赖关系的声明依赖项？ [英] Maven : Should I keep or remove declared dependencies that are also transitives dependencies?

问题描述

你认为删除在maven pom中可以找到的每个传递依赖是个好习惯吗？

示例：

我的项目取决于A和B.

B也是A的传递依赖。 >
我应该保持B在我的pom还是删除它？什么是最好的？

具有所有已知的罐子，即使是传递性的，在pom上宣布还是只保留顶级罐子？

这是一个有点主观，但我试图清理一些巨大的庞巴姆（父母和孩子）与大量的传递依赖。我想保持我的pom尽可能简单，但我也希望他们是可维护的。

解决方案

如果您的项目对B有直接依赖关系，那么即使B是A的传递依赖，也应该保留它。在下一个版本中，A不会使用B，您将不得不重组pom.xml。

通常，Maven依赖关系应反映逻辑项目依赖关系。

Do you think it is a good practice to remove every transitive dependencies that can be found in a maven pom?

Example:
My project depends on A and B.
B is also a transitive dependency of A.
Should I keep B in my pom or remove it ?

What is the best:
having all known jars, even transitive one, declared on the pom or keeping only the top level jars ?

This is a little bit subjective, but I am trying to clean some huge poms (parent and children) with a lot of transitive dependencies. I want to keep my pom as simple as possible, but I want also them to be maintainable.

解决方案

If your project has direct dependencies on B then you should keep it even if B is a transitive dependency of A. It can be that in the next version A won't use B an you'll have to restructure the pom.xml.

Generally, Maven dependencies should reflect the logical project dependencies.

这篇关于Maven：我应该保留还是删除也是传递依赖关系的声明依赖项？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！