IDependencyResolver是否反模式？ [英] Is IDependencyResolver an anti-pattern?

问题描述

我正在将一些架构更改设计为旧版ASP.NET应用程序。我原型化了一些模仿ASP.NET MVC的IDependencyResolver的依赖解析类。我不会发布，因为它是几乎相同的界面，但在其他自然语言。

I am designing some architectural changes into a legacy ASP.NET application. I prototyped some classes for dependency resolution that mimic the ASP.NET MVC's IDependencyResolver. I won't post because it is pretty much the same interface, but in other natural language.

我想到它可能被认为是服务位置，反过来通常（在某些情况下不完全）被谴责支持依赖注入。然而，我找不到任何关于使用ASP.NET MVC依赖解析实现的建议。

I figured out it might be considered Service Location, which in turn is usually (not fully in some cases) condemned in favor of Dependency Injection. Nevertheless, I couldn't find any recommendation against the use of the ASP.NET MVC's dependency resolution implementation.

ASP.NET MVC的IDependencyResolver是否被认为是反模式？这是一件坏事吗？

Is the ASP.NET MVC's IDependencyResolver considered an anti-pattern? Is it a bad thing?

推荐答案

如果你看看签名，你会看到它只是一个服务定位器和另一个名字。 服务定位器是一种反模式，我认为关系是可转移的，所以我认为 IDependencyResolver是一个反模式。

If you look at the signature you will see that it's just a Service Locator with another name. Service Locator is an anti-pattern and I consider the relationship transitive, so I consider IDependencyResolver an anti-pattern.

除此之外，界面也是因为没有Release方法而被破坏。

这篇关于IDependencyResolver是否反模式？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！