NTFS连接与符号链接（用于目录） [英] NTFS Junctions vs. Symbolic Links (for directories)

问题描述

从高层次的观点（意思是仅仅担心结果和接口，而不是实现），指向目录的NTFS重分析点与符号链接之间的行为差​​异（如果有的话）有什么区别指向同一个目录？

From a high-level standpoint (meaning only worrying about the results and the interface, not the implementation), what is the difference in behavior, if any, between an NTFS reparse point that points to a directory and a symbolic link that points to the same directory?

他们是否在堆栈中的同一级别解决，或者是否可以在某个时间无法解析另一个可以（例如在启动时）？

Are they resolved at the same level in the stack, or is it possible for one to be unresolvable at a certain time when the other one can be resolved (e.g. at boot)?

（我知道符号链接也可以用于文件，但是我在问这个目录的区别。）

(I'm aware that symbolic links can also work for files, but I'm asking about the directory difference here.)

推荐答案

众所周知，网络符号链接在客户端解析，而路口由服务器解决。人们可以建议，这些路口对于用户来说更为不可见。

It is known that in network symbolic links are resolved on clients, while junctions are resolved by server. One can suggest, that junctions are more "invisible" for users.

这篇关于NTFS连接与符号链接（用于目录）的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！