容器可以共享一个框架吗? [英] Can containers share a framework?
问题描述
是的,你通常会做的是
strong>替代方案A:
创建一个busybox图像并复制您的框架,将该位置公开为 VOLUME / opt / framework /
从高山
COPY框架/ opt /框架
VOLUME / opt / framework
COPY busyscript.sh / usr / local / bin / busyscript
运行chmod + x / usr / local / bin / busyscript
CMD [busyscript]
虽然 busyscript.sh
看起来像
#!/ bin / sh
#set -x
pid = 0
#SIGTERM-handler
term_handler(){
if [$ pid -ne 0];然后
kill -SIGTERM$ pid
等待$ pid
fi
exit 143; #128 + 15 - SIGTERM
}
#设置处理程序
#在回调时,杀死最后一个后台进程,这是`tail -f / dev / null`并执行指定的处理程序
trap'kill $ {!}; term_handler'SIGTERM
echo开始的代码
#wait forever
while true
do
tail -f / dev / null&等待$ {!}
done
将此图像作为服务在您的docker-compose中添加.yml,让我们说框架,然后,在你想要消费的服务上,你添加
volume_from
- 框架:ro
优点:
- 您可以编译,构建和部署framworks soley
- 运行这个额外的容器有或多或少的运行时开销
Con:
- 图像大小开销(高山,30mb) li>
替代B
您将您的一个服务用作框架基础,让我们说服务A,这意味着你复制该服务的框架(其中一个消耗它),并再次使用 VOLUME / opt / framework
将其公开为卷
在服务B中,同样的方式,您挂载卷
serviceB:
volume_from
- se rviceA:ro
Pro:
- 没有额外的容器
Con:
- 框架需要与serviceA一起部署,无论服务A需要更新
- 您对A有依赖性,A需要一个更新,所有其他容器需要重新创建由于共享
I'm aware that Docker containers can share a data volume but is it possible for them to share frameworks? For instance, if i have two .NET services running on IIS can I just share the framework between them?
Yes you can, what you usually do is
Alternative A:
create a busybox image and COPY your framework, expose the location as a volume VOLUME /opt/framework/
FROM alpine
COPY framework /opt/framework
VOLUME /opt/framework
COPY busyscript.sh /usr/local/bin/busyscript
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/busyscript
CMD ["busyscript"]
While the busyscript.sh
looks like
#!/bin/sh
#set -x
pid=0
# SIGTERM-handler
term_handler() {
if [ $pid -ne 0 ]; then
kill -SIGTERM "$pid"
wait "$pid"
fi
exit 143; # 128 + 15 -- SIGTERM
}
# setup handlers
# on callback, kill the last background process, which is `tail -f /dev/null` and execute the specified handler
trap 'kill ${!}; term_handler' SIGTERM
echo "Started code"
# wait forever
while true
do
tail -f /dev/null & wait ${!}
done
Add this image as a service in your docker-compose.yml as lets say "framework", then, on the services you want them to consume, you add
volume_from
- framework:ro
Pros:
- you can compile, build and deploy the framworks soley
- there is more or less no runtime overhead for running this extra container
Con:
- image-size overhead ( alpine, 30mb)
Alternative B
You use one of your services as the "framework base", lets say service A, that means you copy the framework on that service ( one of the 2 consuming it ) and also again use VOLUME /opt/framework
to expose it as volume
in the service B, the same way, you mount the volume
serviceB:
volume_from
- serviceA:ro
Pro:
- no extra container
Con:
- framework needs to be deployed with serviceA, no matter service A would need updates
- you have a dependency on A, does A need an update, all other containers need to be recreated due to the share
这篇关于容器可以共享一个框架吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!