两个MercurialEclipse插件网站之间有什么关系？ [英] What's the relationship between the two MercurialEclipse plugin sites?
问题描述
仅仅是为了扩展，现在（2012年11月）可用的两个MercurialEclipse插件之间的功能和项目领导的相似之处和差异是什么？有一点问题：
我只想使用Eclipse中的Mercurial项目的工作副本，但是当我查找Mercurial插件时，我面临着这个混乱的选择。我怀疑目前我使用的并不重要。但是当然，我不知道这一点。
目前（2012年11月），有一个MercurialEclipse列在Intland Software网站上的产品中，目前在Eclipse Marketplace为MercurialEclipse（was：HgEclipse），主页是JavaForge.com。 Eclipse Marketplace中的另一个MercurialEclipse是MercurialEclipse，自8月份以来，下载次数更受欢迎，并且在BitBucket.org中有一个主页。
我看到有共享历史，但目前看JavaForge和BitBucket，它们列出不同的版本号（分别为1.9.1和2.0.1）和不同的Eclipse更新站点。我看到代码库已经分歧并重新统一（ http://andrei.gmxhome.de/mercurialeclipse/ index.html的）。我们现在有两个相同的发展阶段的两个场地？还是有可能是一个竞争对手（无论是有意的还是无意的），我必须选择一方？在这种情况下，有人在手边有相关信息选择吗？
简短的答案是与Javaforge站点落后于Bitbucket网站的版本。所有错误应该是Bitbucket网站上的文件： https://bitbucket.org/mercurialeclipse/main
最初MercurialEclipse托管在Bitbucket上。大约在1.5版本，如果我记得正确的Intland分叉到Javaforge。这是HgEclipse起源的地方。一段时间后，这个项目在Javaforge上重新团聚。在2.0版本之前的一段时间后，该项目移回了Bitbucket。回到bitbucket有几个原因。其中一个是Intland没有及时发布，这与用户造成混淆。另一个原因是JavaHg托管在Bitbucket上，而Bitbucket则是一个不错的主机。
即使Intland还没有直接贡献一段时间，我认为他们仍然对托管版本感兴趣。他们的更新网站包括Mercurial二进制文件，而Bitbucket目前没有。
What are the similarities and differences in functionality and project leadership between the two MercurialEclipse plugins that are currently (November 2012) available in the Eclipse Marketplace?
Just to expand on the question a bit:
I just want to use the working copy of a Mercurial project within Eclipse, but when I look for a Mercurial plugin I face this confusing choice. I suspect that for the moment it doesn't matter very much which I use. But of course I don't know that for certain.
At present (November 2012), there's a MercurialEclipse listed among products on Intland Software's web site, present in the Eclipse Marketplace as "MercurialEclipse (was: HgEclipse)", with a home page at JavaForge.com. There's another MercurialEclipse in the Eclipse Marketplace as "MercurialEclipse" that is more popular by downloads since August and that has a home page at BitBucket.org.
I see that there's shared history, but at present, looking at JavaForge and BitBucket, they list different version numbers (1.9.1 and 2.0.1 respectively) and different Eclipse update sites. I see that the codebase has diverged and reunited before (http://andrei.gmxhome.de/mercurialeclipse/index.html). Do we now have two sites for two stages in the same line of development? Or is there perhaps a rivalry (whether intentional or unintentional) in which I'll have to choose a side? In that case, does someone here have at hand the relevant information for choosing?
The short answer is they are the same with the Javaforge site lagging behind the Bitbucket site in releases. All bugs should be files on the Bitbucket site: https://bitbucket.org/mercurialeclipse/main
Originally MercurialEclipse was hosted on Bitbucket. Around the 1.5 release if I remember correctly Intland forked it to Javaforge. This is where the name HgEclipse originated. After some time the project reunited on Javaforge. Some time later just before the 2.0 release the project moved back to Bitbucket. There are a few reasons for moving back to bitbucket. One of them being that Intland did not do releases promptly and this caused confusion with users. Another reason is the JavaHg is hosted on Bitbucket and Bitbucket is otherwise a nice host.
Even though Intland has not directly contributed in a while I think they are still interested in hosting releases. Their update site includes Mercurial binaries whereas the Bitbucket one currently doesn't.
这篇关于两个MercurialEclipse插件网站之间有什么关系？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
