轻松打破折叠的方式 [英] Easy way to break foldl

查看:97
本文介绍了轻松打破折叠的方式的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我需要折叠。这是一个虚拟示例,当我计算列表中的值的总和并且遇到太大的值时(如10)

  L = [1,2,3,4,10,5,6,7],

Res =
try
列表:foldl(
fun (I,Value) - >
if(I< 10) - >
Value + I;
true - >
throw({too_big_value,Value})
end
end,
0,L)
catch
throw:{too_big_value,Value} - >价值
end,

Res。

我知道这个例子是人造的,但有什么好的方法来打破折叠(我知道那个折总是扫描整个结构)?



请注意,即使我从折叠中断,我也需要检索正确的数据。在这种情况下,我应该从以前的迭代中获取数据(如我在示例中所做的那样)。

解决方案

你做的正确,使用try / catch抛出非本地返回。如果函数从乐趣中看到返回值,以决定是否继续,那么它不会被折叠。


I need to break from foldl. Here is a dummy example how to break from fold when I count sum of values in a list and meet too big value (i.e. 10)

   L = [1,2,3,4,10,5,6,7],

   Res = 
      try
         lists:foldl(
            fun(I, Value) ->
               if (I < 10) ->
                  Value + I;
               true ->
                  throw({too_big_value, Value})
               end
            end,
            0, L)
      catch
         throw:{too_big_value, Value} -> Value
      end,

   Res.

I know this example is artificial but are there any nice method to break out fold (I know that fold always scan the whole structure)?

Please note, that i need to retrieve correct data even if i break from fold. In this case i should get data from previous iteration (as it done in my example).

解决方案

You're doing it right, using a throw with try/catch for nonlocal return. If the function looked at the return value from the fun to decide whether or not to continue, it wouldn't be foldl anymore.

这篇关于轻松打破折叠的方式的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆