在Scala中使用import scala.reflect.io.File或java.io.File会更好吗？ [英] Is it better to use import scala.reflect.io.File or java.io.File in Scala?

问题描述

我看到scala.reflect.io.File类，这是否应该帮助文件操作？我应该更喜欢使用这个而不是java.io.File？这个类的目的是什么？

解决方案

你也不应该使用 java.nio .file ，当然。

如果您想用特殊的运算符增强该API，请使用扩展方法。该代码的作者在邮件列表上表示了很多。被困在Java 6被认为是不幸的。

你指向的包被拉到 scala-reflect.jar 来支持反射，但是对于它的不支持状态，无处不在的警告。

$ b

AbstractFile 抽象被使用位置，它有一个源文件。你从中得到的文件是一个 java.io.File ，但是 AbstractFile reflect.io.Path 抽象（带有文件和目录亚型）。所以所有的代码都保留在一起打包。

我必须停下来思考每一次 AbstractFile 和 File AbstractFile 就像完全不同于 File 的T恤，但它穿着

在背面说： Position 与<$ c $无关c> io.Position 。

以下是触及 api.Position ，当然它在scaladoc中是面向用户的;注意它是一个Java文件：

  / **这个位置的源文件对应的Java文件。 
 * 
 *返回类型是scala.reflect.io.AbstractFile，属于Scala反射的一个实验部分。 
 *除非您知道自己在做什么，否则不应使用它。在后来的版本中，这个API将被改进
 *并作为scala.reflect.api的一部分公开。 
 * 
 * @group Common 
 * / 
 def source：scala.reflect.internal.util.SourceFile 
  

为了回答你的第一个问题，我认为可以肯定地说，是的，它应该是有帮助的。

I see the scala.reflect.io.File class, is this supposed to help with file operations? Am I supposed to prefer to use this rather than java.io.File? What is the purpose of this class?

解决方案

Neither, you're supposed to use java.nio.file, of course.

If you want to "enhance" that API with fancy operators, use extension methods. The author of that code has said as much on the mailing list. Being stuck on Java 6 is considered unfortunate.

The package you're pointing to was pulled into the scala-reflect.jar to support reflection, but warnings are everywhere about its unsupported status.

The AbstractFile abstraction is used by Position, which has a source file. The "file" you get from that is a java.io.File, but AbstractFile has factory methods that take the reflect.io.Path abstraction (with File and Directory subtypes). So all that code remains packaged together.

I have to stop and think every time AbstractFile and File cross my path (pun alert). I used to have a purple "AbstractFile is, like, totally different from File" t-shirt, but it wore out with multiple washings.

On the back it said, "Position has nothing to do with io.Position."

Here is the warning as it touches api.Position, where of course it is user-facing in the scaladoc; notice it says it is a "Java file":

  /** Java file corresponding to the source file of this position.
   *
   *  The return type is `scala.reflect.io.AbstractFile`, which belongs to an experimental part of Scala reflection.
   *  It should not be used unless you know what you are doing. In subsequent releases, this API will be refined
   *  and exposed as a part of scala.reflect.api.
   *
   *  @group Common
   */
  def source: scala.reflect.internal.util.SourceFile

To answer your first question, I think it's safe to say, Yes, it was supposed to help.

这篇关于在Scala中使用import scala.reflect.io.File或java.io.File会更好吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！