Windows网络共享上的svn存储库 [英] svn repository on Windows network share

查看:179
本文介绍了Windows网络共享上的svn存储库的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述



我正在构建一个应用程序,每个Windows客户端机器都有一个存储在共享文件系统中的svn存储库本地工作的文件集,并可以定期与其他团队同步。从服务器的角度来看,除了Windows共享挂载点之外,我只想依靠它。是否svn file:// URL协议支持共享文件系统,还是假定文件系统是本地的?



在Win9x环境中提到了BDB和FSFS的问题,但我不清楚是否通过file:// URL同时访问的存储库在更新版本的Windows(或其他操作系统)中是安全的。

编辑
应用程序I' m建设将直接使用svn,所以我愿意建立一个相对受限制的环境,如果它允许一个安全的并发共享协作环境。 解决方案的乌龟SVN文件实际上强烈阻止它 - 见


总结:


file:// access仅适用于本地
单用户访问,特别是
测试和调试。


Is it safe for multiple computers to concurrently access an svn repository stored on a shared filesystem?

I'm building an application in which each Windows client machine has a local working set of files, and can periodically synchronize with the rest of the team. From a server standpoint, I'd like to rely on nothing except a Windows shared mount point. Does the svn file:// URL protocol support shared filesystems, or does it assume that the filesystem is local?

The Subversion docs mention issues with BDB and FSFS in Win9x environments, but it's not clear to me whether or not repositories concurrently accessed via file:// URLs are safe in more recent versions of Windows (or other operating systems, for that matter).

Edit The application I'm building will be using svn directly, so I'm willing to build a relatively constrained environment if it'll permit a safe concurrent shared collaboration environment.

解决方案

The Tortoise SVN docs actually strongly discourage it - see this link. .

To summarise:

file:// access is intended for local, single-user access only, particularly testing and debugging.

这篇关于Windows网络共享上的svn存储库的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆