为什么浮点数已经签名为零？ [英] Why do floating-point numbers have signed zeros?

问题描述

为什么双打有 -0 以及 +0 ？什么是背景和意义？

解决方案

-0 ）视为 0 *******。当负数<！em>浮点数非常接近于零时，可能会导致它被认为是 0 （要清楚，我指的是来）

以数学术语：

这说明 0 和<$ c $在计算意义上，c> -0 。

---

下面是一些相关的资源，已经提出了。为了完整起见，我已经包括了他们：

• 维基百科关于签名零的文章 每位计算机科学家应该知道的关于浮点运算的知识（请参见签名为零的章节）
  
• （PDF） 关于Nothing's Sign Bit的很多事情 - W. Kahan的一篇有趣的论文

Why do doubles have -0 as well as +0? What is the background and significance?

解决方案

-0 is (generally) treated as 0 *******. It can result when a negative floating-point number is so close to zero that it can be considered 0 (to be clear, I'm referring to arithmetic underflow, and the results of the following computations are interpreted as being exactly ±0, not just really small numbers). e.g.

System.out.println(-1 / Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY);

-0.0

If we consider the same case with a positive number, we will receive our good old 0:

System.out.println(1 / Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY);

0.0

---

******* Here's a case where using -0.0 results in something different than when using 0.0:

System.out.println(1 / 0.0);
System.out.println(1 / -0.0);

Infinity
-Infinity

This makes sense if we consider the function 1 / x. As x approaches 0 from the +-side, we should get positive infinity, but as it approaches from the --side, we should get negative infinity. The graph of the function should make this clear:

(source)

In math-terms:

This illustrates one significant difference between 0 and -0 in the computational sense.

---

Here are some relevant resources, some of which have been brought up already. I've included them for the sake of completeness:

• Wikipedia article on signed zero
• "What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic" (See Signed Zero section)
• (PDF) "Much Ado About Nothing's Sign Bit" - an interesting paper by W. Kahan.

这篇关于为什么浮点数已经签名为零？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！