我如何实现一种方法来接受消费者< Optional< T>>那在T中是逆变的? [英] How can I implement a method that accepts a Consumer<Optional<T>> that is contravariant in T?
问题描述
在下面的示例中,我可以将 Consumer< Optional< Integer>
传递给 foo
,但不能消费与LT;可选<号>>
。另一方面,我可以将任何一种类型传递给 foo2
,但是我不能从方法体中调用消费者的accept方法。有没有办法改变 foo
方法,以便它可以工作?我最初的直觉是尝试 void foo(Consumer< Result <?super T>> c)
,但这显然并不意味着我会假设。
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
公开课测试< T> {
public void foo(消费者<可选< T>> c){
可选< T> t = null;
c.accept(t); //编译
}
public void foo2(Consumer< ;? extends Optional< ;? super T>> c){
可选< T> t = null;
c.accept(t); //不会编译
}
public static void bar(){
test< Integer> t = null;
消费者<可选<号码>> crn = null;
消费者<可选<整数>> cri = null;
t.foo(cri); //编译
t.foo(crn); //不会编译
t.foo2(cri); //编译
t.foo2(crn); //编译
}
}
原因是从类型系统的角度来看, Optional
并不是特别的:我们知道可选
只有一个提供者方法( Optional.get()
),并且它没有使用方法(例如 Optional.set(T)
);但编译器不会。
所以,编译器不会让你传递可选< Integer>
需要一个可选< Number>
方法,以防万一您调用神话的 set
方法你传入了 Double
而不是整数
。
解决此问题的唯一方法是将可选< T>
更改为可选< S>
,其中 S
是超类型 T
。您可以通过以下两种方式之一来执行此操作:
- 由于
可选
及其缺乏消费者方法;但你会得到一个未经检查的警告(由于可选
的属性,这实际上可以压制, ) - 创建一个新的
可选的
是正确的类型 - 可能更纯粹,但是会创建新实例的运行时间开销。
为了在方法中写这样的东西,你必须把它写成一个静态方法(可能在 test
class)中,但它可以在其他地方); Java的类型系统没有足够的表达能力来编写实例方法签名所需的约束:
public static< T,S延伸T> void foo3(Consumer< Optional< T>> c,test< s> test){
可选< S> s = null;
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)//安全,因为可选的属性。
可选< T> t =(可选的< T>)(可选的<>);
c.accept(t);
$ / code>
并且像这样调用(使用 cri ,
crn
和 t
来自问题代码):
foo3(cri,t); //编译
foo3(crn,t); //编译
In the following sample, I can pass a Consumer<Optional<Integer>
to foo
, but not a Consumer<Optional<Number>>
. On the other hand, I can pass either type to foo2
, but then I can't call the accept method of the consumer from the method body. Is there a way to change the foo
method so that this works? My initial intuition was to try void foo(Consumer<Result<? super T>> c)
but that apparently doesn't mean what I would assume.
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
public class test<T> {
public void foo(Consumer<Optional<T>> c) {
Optional<T> t = null;
c.accept(t); // compiles
}
public void foo2(Consumer<? extends Optional<? super T>> c) {
Optional<T> t = null;
c.accept(t); // doesn't compile
}
public static void bar() {
test<Integer> t = null;
Consumer<Optional<Number>> crn = null;
Consumer<Optional<Integer>> cri = null;
t.foo(cri); // compiles
t.foo(crn); // doesn't compile
t.foo2(cri); // compiles
t.foo2(crn); // compiles
}
}
The reason for this is that Optional
isn't special from the point of view of the type system: we know that Optional
only has a provider method (Optional.get()
) and that it has no consumer methods (like Optional.set(T)
); but the compiler doesn't.
So, the compiler it won't let you pass an Optional<Integer>
where an Optional<Number>
is required: it is preventing you from ever calling that mythical set
method, in case you passed in a Double
instead of an Integer
.
The only way around this is to change the Optional<T>
into an Optional<S>
, where S
is a supertype of T
. You can do this by either:
- Casting - which you know is safe, because of the immutability of
Optional
and its lack of consumer methods; but you get an unchecked warning (which is actually fine to suppress, because of the properties ofOptional
). - Creating a new
Optional
of the right type - maybe more pure, but has the runtime overhead of creating the new instance.
In order to write such a thing in a method, you would have to write it as a static method (probably in the test
class, but it could be elsewhere); Java's type system isn't expressive enough to be able to write the required constraints on an instance method's signature:
public static <T, S extends T> void foo3(Consumer<Optional<T>> c, test<S> test) {
Optional<S> s = null;
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // Safe because of properties of Optional.
Optional<T> t = (Optional<T>) (Optional<?>) s;
c.accept(t);
}
and invoke like this (using the values of cri
, crn
and t
from the question code):
foo3(cri, t); // compiles
foo3(crn, t); // compiles
这篇关于我如何实现一种方法来接受消费者< Optional< T>>那在T中是逆变的?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!