使用Git与ClearCase，AccuRev或Perforce的价值？ [英] Value of using Git with ClearCase, AccuRev or Perforce?

问题描述

我对使用传统SCM产品（ClearCase，AccuRev，Perforce等）与Git一起使用分布式团队的大型项目的价值（或缺乏）感兴趣。

从增加团队活动可见度的角度来看，是否有重要的增值？控制分支和合并？访问控制和安全性？发布工程？其他因素？

或者Git本身更好？或者是否有一个开源的供应链管理软件可以等同于上面提到的商业产品？

谢谢。

解决方案

使用尽可能少的系统，你可以逃脱。如果您在单独使用git时看不到任何优势，那么就单独使用git。

大多数项目只使用一个VCS（例如git或Subversion）和可以做他们需要做的一切（分支，..），除非你有一个要求，你知道哪些是不寻常的，你可以肯定的是，一个产品会做你需要的一切。

I am interested in the value (or lack thereof) of using a traditional SCM product (ClearCase, AccuRev, Perforce, etc.) along with Git for large projects with distributed teams.

Is there a significant value-add in terms of increased visibility into team activities? Control of branching and merging? Access control and security? Release engineering? Other factors?

Or is it better to Git by itself? Or is there an open source SCM that would be equivalent to the commercial products mentioned above?

Thanks.

解决方案

Use as few systems as you can get away with. If you don't see an advantage in using anything other than git alone, then just use git alone.

Most projects use just one VCS (e.g. git or Subversion) and can do everything they need to do (branching, ..) so unless you have a requirement you know of which is unusual, you can be pretty certain that one product will do everything you need.

这篇关于使用Git与ClearCase，AccuRev或Perforce的价值？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！