混帐合并不创建合并提交,没有MERGE_HEAD [英] git merge not creating merge commit, no MERGE_HEAD
问题描述
在Linux上使用Git 1.8.1.2,我一直在基于 master
并行地调用两个不同的分支(称为A和B),并创建了第三个分支(称为M),它合并了这两个分支 - 到目前为止还没有它自己的非合并提交。
在完成一个主分支(A),我检出了合并分支( 报告了一些合并冲突,这是预期的。我编辑受影响的文件以删除冲突标记,然后 但是当我 我没有使用任何特殊的合并策略,所以我想默认( 如果手动创建 可能会发生什么?这是Git中的一个bug吗?是否有任何理由在 我相信你应该使用 Using Git 1.8.1.2 on Linux, I have been working on two different branches based on After doing some work on one of the "primary" branches (A), I checked out the merge branch ( Some merge conflicts are reported, which is expected. I edit the affected files to remove the conflict markers, then But then when I I am not using any special merge strategy, so I suppose the default ( If I manually create What could be going on? Is this a bug in Git—is there ever any reason for I believe you should use
这篇关于混帐合并不创建合并提交,没有MERGE_HEAD的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋! git checkout M
),验证它已经拥有了B中的所有内容( git merge B
报告
已经是最新的。
),所以我 git合并A
来拉入A上的新工作。
git add
它们。所有看起来都很正常。
git commit
时,提交信息没有提供这个指示合并。如果我继续,结果提交(在M分支中)看起来只是一个简单的提交(在我之前合并的A和B之上); git show
不会报告合并:
父母。在提交之前, .git
包含 MERGE_MODE
(空),但不存在 MERGE_HEAD
。
递归
)正在使用。无论如何,这看起来不是一个策略问题:工作树的内容看起来完全像我期望的那样。
MERGE_HEAD
与提交之前A的头部的散列值进行比较,结果提交看起来正常在 gitg
中,尽管这当然会让我有点紧张。
git merge
命令之后没有创建 MERGE_HEAD
创建一个提交? 1.8.4.3似乎有相同的行为。
git merge --no-ff your_feature_branch
master
in parallel (call them A and B), and also created a third branch (call it M) which merges those two branches—so far with no non-merge commits of its own.git checkout M
), verified that it already had everything in B (git merge B
reports Already up-to-date.
) , and so I git merge A
to pull in the new work on A.git add
them. All looking normal so far.git commit
, the commit message gives no indication of this being a merge. If I proceed, the resulting commit (in the M branch) looks like just a simple commit (atop my prior merge of A and B); git show
does not report Merge:
parents. Prior to the commit, .git
contains MERGE_MODE
(empty) but there is no MERGE_HEAD
.recursive
) is being used. Anyway this does not look like a strategy problem: the contents of the working tree appear exactly like I would expect them to.MERGE_HEAD
with the hash of the head of A before committing, the resulting commit looks normal e.g. in gitg
, though of course this makes me a little nervous.MERGE_HEAD
not be created after git merge
command which did not create a commit? 1.8.4.3 appears to have the same behavior.git merge --no-ff your_feature_branch