谷歌分析告诉我，超过2％的访问者使用Chrome 1或1.5，这是否准确？ [英] Google analytics tells me that over 2% of my visitors are using Chrome 1 or 1.5, is that accurate?

问题描述

这让Chrome 1和1.5都成为我网站前十名使用Chrome浏览器的访问者，并且它们纯粹由至少两位数版本包含，并且大部分为v32。

它也使得这些版本的用户高于我自己的浏览器支持总数的1％截断值。只是勉强。 （实际上，它超过2％。）

纵观更广的范围（过去一年），1.5甚至没有出现在前20名，但1.0是＃12（在.6％，远低于截止时间）。

我是否认真考虑这些数据并考虑测试即将推出的（JQuery / JQM / Bootstrap 3 riddled）的网站与Chrome的第一个版本？我甚至不认为这是可能的。

或者这是一些奇怪的Google Analytics异常吗？

解决方案

这也...我有大约1.0％的GA显示Chrome 1.5和100％（根据GA）是移动，97％是三星品牌。看看这个页面 - http：/ /www.webapps-online.com/online-tools/user-agent-strings/dv/brand125499/samsung-galaxy-note-iii - 让我怀疑GA是否正在计算字符串，如版本/ 1.5 Chrome / 28.0.1500.94 为Chrome 1.5。

我最好的猜测是谷歌分析只是搞砸了三星用户代理字符串，这（再次，根据该网页）看起来是Chrome 28。至少这是我要标记为。

（对不起对于4个月的延迟响应，其他人可能也会使用谷歌搜索。）

更新：这些是移动设备信息对我的谷歌浏览器1.5的结果... ...
$ b $ pre $ code三星SCH-I545 Galaxy S IV
三星SCH-I337 Galaxy S IV
三星GT-I9500 Galaxy S IV
三星SGH-M919 Galaxy S IV
Samsu ng SM-N900V Galaxy Note 3
三星SM-N900A Galaxy Note 3
三星SM-N900P Galaxy Note 3
三星SM-N900T Galaxy Note 3
三星SGH-I537 Galaxy S4活跃
三星SM-P600 Galaxy Note 10.1 2014
三星SM-T520 Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1
三星SGH-I337M Galaxy S IV
三星SM-P900 Galaxy Note Pro
三星GT-I9505 Galaxy S IV
三星SCH-M919 Galaxy S IV
三星SM-T900 Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2
三星SCH-R970 Galaxy S IV
三星SCH-R970X Galaxy S IV
三星SM-N9005 Galaxy Note 3
三星SM-N900W8 Galaxy Note 3
三星SM-T320 Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4
三星SPH-L720T Galaxy S4
三星SM-P905V Galaxy Note Pro

所有这些都显示潜在的用户代理，其中 Version / 1.5 Chrome / 28.0.1500.94 ，它应该被解释为Chrome 28，而不是1.5。

This puts both Chrome 1 and 1.5 in the top ten Chrome-using visitors to my site, and they are surrounded purely by at least double-digit versions, and mostly v32.

It also gets users of these versions above my self-imposed "1% of total" cutoff for browser support. Just barely. (Actually, it puts it at just over 2%.)

Looking at a broader range (the past year), 1.5 doesn't even show up in the top 20, but 1.0 is #12 (at .6%, well below the cutoff).

Am I to take these stats to heart and consider testing my upcoming (JQuery/JQM/Bootstrap 3 riddled) site with the first version of Chrome? I didn't even think that was possible.

Or is this some weird Analytics anomaly?

解决方案

I noticed this also... I have about 1.0% on GA showing Chrome 1.5 and 100% (according to GA) is "Mobile" and 97% is "Samsung" brand. Taking a look at this page - http://www.webapps-online.com/online-tools/user-agent-strings/dv/brand125499/samsung-galaxy-note-iii - makes me wonder if GA is counting strings like Version/1.5 Chrome/28.0.1500.94 as Chrome 1.5.

My best guess would be Google Analytics just screwed up the parsing of the newer Samsung user agent strings, which (again, according to that webpage) looks to be Chrome 28. At least that's what I'm going to mark it down as.

(Sorry for the 4 month late response. Figured other people might be Googling this also.)

UPDATE: These are the entries for "Mobile Device Info" on my GA results for Chrome 1.5...

Samsung SCH-I545 Galaxy S IV
Samsung SCH-I337 Galaxy S IV
Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S IV
Samsung SGH-M919 Galaxy S IV
Samsung SM-N900V Galaxy Note 3
Samsung SM-N900A Galaxy Note 3
Samsung SM-N900P Galaxy Note 3
Samsung SM-N900T Galaxy Note 3
Samsung SGH-I537 Galaxy S4 Active
Samsung SM-P600 Galaxy Note 10.1 2014
Samsung SM-T520 Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1
Samsung SGH-I337M Galaxy S IV
Samsung SM-P900 Galaxy Note Pro
Samsung GT-I9505 Galaxy S IV
Samsung SCH-M919 Galaxy S IV
Samsung SM-T900 Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2
Samsung SCH-R970 Galaxy S IV
Samsung SCH-R970X Galaxy S IV
Samsung SM-N9005 Galaxy Note 3
Samsung SM-N900W8 Galaxy Note 3
Samsung SM-T320 Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4
Samsung SPH-L720T Galaxy S4
Samsung SM-P905V Galaxy Note Pro

All of these show potential user agents with Version/1.5 Chrome/28.0.1500.94, which should be interpretted as Chrome 28, not 1.5.

这篇关于谷歌分析告诉我，超过2％的访问者使用Chrome 1或1.5，这是否准确？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！