Google Analytics和实时分析比较:Chartbeat vs Clicky vs Mixpanel [英] Google Analytics and real-time analytics comparison: Chartbeat vs Clicky vs Mixpanel

查看:246
本文介绍了Google Analytics和实时分析比较:Chartbeat vs Clicky vs Mixpanel的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述



我们很想听听Chartbeat,Clicky,Mixpanel和Google Analytics的意见和经验。人们部署Google和其他实时平台,时间系统?或者是实时系统足以取代Google?



在实时系统中,您使用哪种系统?为什么?



谢谢!

解决方案

我对Charbeat,Clicky或Mixpanel没有特别的意见,但我在其他Web分析工具方面有很多经验,例如Web Trends,Yahoo Web Analytics,Omniture Site Catalyst和Google Analytics ... ...

根据我的经验,真实时间报告主要用于跟踪代码的实施和持续QA。这实际上取决于您的网站的性质,但我还没有看到任何需要实时报告的客户。 24小时的延迟比接受的更多,因为我曾与大多数客户合作报告或期望每周,每月,每季度等报告。

IOW对于您的编码器更有用,但对您的记者很少有用。如果您的网站和实施情况稳定并且不太可能发生变化,那么实时报告的价值就很小。


We're curious to hear opinions about and experiences with Chartbeat, Clicky, Mixpanel, and Google Analytics.

Do people deploy Google and one of these other real-time systems? Or is the real-time system sufficient to displace Google?

Of the real-time systems, which do you use and why?

Thanks!

解决方案

I don't really have an opinion about Charbeat, Clicky or Mixpanel specifically, but I have lots of experience in other web analytics toos, such as Web Trends, Yahoo Web Analytics, Omniture Site Catalyst, and Google Analytics...

In my experience, real-time reporting is mostly useful for implementation and ongoing QA of the tracking code. It really depends on the nature of your site but I have yet to see any client that needed real-time reporting. 24 hour delay is more than acceptable, as most clients I have worked with report or expect reports on a weekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.. basis.

IOW it's more useful for your coders but rarely useful for your reporters. If your website and implementation is solid and not likely to change a whole lot, there is very little value in real-time reporting.

这篇关于Google Analytics和实时分析比较:Chartbeat vs Clicky vs Mixpanel的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆