BeanShell的当前状态 [英] Current state of BeanShell

问题描述

我们正在研究使用BeanShell编写执行大量文件操作的脚本的可能性。
当前使用bash脚本。

现在主要问题是 - 此时BeanShell是否稳定？
我知道它没有得到积极的支持，但是这很重要吗？有错误吗？
那么BeanShell2呢？它是原创还有一些错误修复？或者是否还有其他更改？

我也想知道在此时使用Groovy更好，因为它由Pivotal积极支持和开发。

有关Bash脚本，BeanShell和Groovy脚本的优点和缺点的其他信息，我们将不胜感激。

解决方案

你真的没有给我们太多的东西继续下去。没有关于你的环境的细节，没有太多的标准。没有什么关于你想用脚本解决的问题。你清楚地考虑将bash移出bash，但你并没有真正告诉我们为什么。

如果你对bash，那么我同意@Nick Ellis。坚持下去。

但是，如果由于某种原因决定选择Groovy或Beanshell，则选择非常明确。 Groovy是一种支持良好的语言，其用户群和应用程序基础都在飞速发展。 Beanshell ...不是那么多。

We are investigating possibility of using BeanShell to write scripts that do a lot of file operations. Currently bash scripts are used.

Now the main question is - is BeanShell stable at this moment? I know that it is not actively supported , but does that matter? Are there bugs? What about BeanShell2? Is it original plus some bug-fixes? Or are there other changes?

I am also wondering if at this point in time using Groovy is better given that it is actively supported and developed by Pivotal.

Any additional information regarding pros and cons of either Bash scripts, BeanShell and Groovy scripts is greatly appreciated.

解决方案

You really haven't given us much to go on here. No specifics about your environment, not much in the way of criteria. Nothing really about the problems that you are trying to solve with scripting. You are clearly thinking about moving away from bash for some reason, but you haven't really told us why.

If you are comfortable with bash, then I agree with @Nick Ellis. Stick with it.

However, if for some reason you are determined to choose either Groovy or Beanshell, the choice is pretty clear. Groovy is a well-supported language whose user base and application base are both growing by leaps and bounds. Beanshell... not so much.

这篇关于BeanShell的当前状态的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！