“JavaScript Micro-Templating”的区别是什么？和mustache.js / handlebars.js？ [英] What is the difference between "JavaScript Micro-Templating" and mustache.js/handlebars.js?

问题描述

首先，我再次对这样的新手问题表示歉意，如果这个问题已经在其他地方得到了解答。

有太多的模板引擎，我真的不知道如何选择！我认真研究这，但仍然无所适从。

我主要想知道mustache.js / handlebars.js的优点吗？与 JavaScript Micro-Templating 相比较

请举例说明，非常感谢！ 解决方案

/ p>

http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/client-side-templating-throwdown-mustache-handlebars-dustjs-and-more

它包含了很多考虑因素和良好的现场方法。

此外，它来自LinkedIn，因此您可以相信它非常全面。

编辑：

只有真正的遗漏才是来自Twitter的Hogan，可能是因为它当时（现在仍然是）这个街区上的新孩子。 http://twitter.github.com/hogan.js/ ）就像基于小胡子的把手。功能介于胡须和把手之间。表现5/5。

我在客户端和服务器端都使用Hogan，一旦掌握了它，真的很棒。

First, I apologize for such a novice question again, and if this has been answered elsewhere.

There are too many template engine，I really do not know how to choose！I seriously study this, but still at a loss.

I mainly want to know the advantages of mustache.js/handlebars.js? Compared with the JavaScript Micro-Templating

Please give examples to explain, thank you very much!

解决方案

For a pretty well-rounded comparison see

http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/client-side-templating-throwdown-mustache-handlebars-dustjs-and-more

It includes a lot of considerations and a good 'in-the-field' approach.

Moreover, it's from LinkedIn so you can trust it's pretty thorough.

EDIT:

Only real omission is Hogan from Twitter, likely because it was (and still is) a new kid on the block . http://twitter.github.com/hogan.js/) Like Handlebars based on Mustache. Functionality is in between Mustache and Handlebars. Performance 5/5.

I use Hogan both on the client-side and with Nodejs on the server-side and it's really great working with it once you get the hang of it.

hth

这篇关于“JavaScript Micro-Templating”的区别是什么？和mustache.js / handlebars.js？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！