我应该在Heroku Cedar上使用瘦身或独角兽吗？ [英] Should I use thin or unicorn on Heroku Cedar

问题描述

我最近'升级'我的应用程序到heroku的雪松平台上。默认情况下，我使用 thin 作为Web服务器。但我一直很想使用 unicorn 来实现并发性，并让我的dyno美元成为父亲。但我担心在使用Thin以外的产品时会遇到一些问题。

有没有人有这个决定的真实生活经验？

谢谢！

乔纳森

---

• 这篇文章让我对这个想法感到兴奋： http://michaelvanrooijen.com/articles/2011 / 06/01-more-concurrency-on-a-single-heroku-dyno-with-the-new-celadon-cedar-stack /


• 我知道每一个应用是不同的，并且你应该建立一个登台环境并为你自己尝试。但是，如果它在你的升级环境下看起来不错，它们是我们应该知道的任何陷阱吗？
我想知道为什么每个人不应该这样做


解决方案

更新 - 3个月后。



<我一直在使用独角兽生产3个月，而且我非常高兴。每个测功机使用4个麒麟工人。



您需要注意的一件事是内存消耗和泄漏。实际上，每个测功机没有512MB的内存，而是由heroku工人的数量除。但记住这一点 - 这是一个很大的成本节省




I recently 'upgraded' my app to the cedar platform on heroku. By default I am using thin as a web server. But I have always been tempted to use unicorn for concurrency and having my dyno dollar go father. But I worry there are some gotchas in using something other than Thin.

Does anyone have real life experience with this decision?

Thanks!

Jonathan

---

Notes:

• This was the article that got me excited about the idea: http://michaelvanrooijen.com/articles/2011/06/01-more-concurrency-on-a-single-heroku-dyno-with-the-new-celadon-cedar-stack/
• I know every app is different, and that you should build a staging env and try it for yourself. But if it looks great in your staging env, are they any pitfalls that we should know about?

I want to know reasons why everyone shouldn't do this

解决方案

Update -- 3 months later.

I have been using unicorn in production for 3 months, and I have been very pleased. I use 4 unicorn workers per dyno.

One thing you do need to keep an eye out for is memory consumption and leakage. In effect instead of having 512MB of memory per dyno -- you have that divided by the number of heroku workers. But keeping that in mind -- it has been a great cost saver

这篇关于我应该在Heroku Cedar上使用瘦身或独角兽吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！