< b>与< b>的区别是什么?和< strong>,< i>和< em> ;? [英] What's the difference between <b> and <strong>, <i> and <em>?
问题描述
< strong>
,<<< ;在HTML / XHTML中,i>
和< em>
什么时候应该使用它们?
它们对普通Web浏览器渲染引擎具有相同的效果,但它们之间存在根本区别。 正如作者在讨论列表帖子: 考虑三种不同的情况: Bold是一种风格 - 当你说大胆的一个词,人们基本知道 不幸的是,这对盲人毫无意义。在手机
意味着在信件的周围添加更多,比如说墨水,直到他们在其他信件中突出
为止。
和其他PDA上,文字已经大胆,因为屏幕分辨率非常小。
< b>
是一种风格
HTML从来不是为了关注风格。不要 Tim Berners-Lee 和语义网。
What's the difference between <b>
and <strong>
, <i>
and <em>
in HTML/XHTML? When should you use each?
They have the same effect on normal web browser rendering engines, but there is a fundamental difference between them.
As the author writes in a discussion list post:
Think of three different situations:
- web browsers
- blind people
- mobile phones
"Bold" is a style - when you say "bold a word", people basically know that it means to add more, let's say "ink", around the letters until they stand out more amongst the rest of the letters.
That, unfortunately, means nothing to a blind person. On mobile phones and other PDAs, text is already bold because screen resolution is very small. You can't bold a bold without screwing something up.
<b>
is a style - we know what "bold" is supposed to look like.
<strong>
however is an indication of how something should be understood. "Strong" could (and often does) mean "bold" in a browser, but it could also mean a lower tone for a speaking program like Jaws (for blind people) or be represented by an underline (since you can't bold a bold) on a Palm Pilot.
HTML was never meant to be about styles. Do some searches for "Tim Berners-Lee" and "the semantic web." <strong>
is semantic—it describes the text it surrounds (e.g., "this text should be stronger than the rest of the text you've displayed") as opposed to describing how the text it surrounds should be displayed (e.g., "this text should be bold").
这篇关于< b>与< b>的区别是什么?和< strong>,< i>和< em> ;?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!