在HTML中拥有锚标签（< a>）的孩子是否合法？ [英] Is it legal to have children of an anchor tag (<a>) in HTML?

问题描述

在HTML中拥有锚标记的子项是否合法？举例来说：

 < a> 
< font>示例< / font> 
< img src =example.jpg/> 
< / a> 
  

它在浏览器中正常工作，但它有效吗？请帮助 解决方案

是的 - 甚至更多的是随着HTML 5（来自规范）：

尽管之前HTML版本将元素限制为只包含短语内容（基本上，以前的版本称为内联内容），现在a元素是透明的;也就是说，现在允许a元素的一个实例包含流内容（实质上，以前版本中称为块内容的内容） - 如果该元素的父元素是允许包含流内容的元素。

< blockquote>

Is it legal to have children of an anchor tag in HTML? For an example:

 <a>
     <font>Example</font>
     <img src="example.jpg"/>
 </a>

It works fine in the browsers.But is it valid? Please help

解决方案

Yes - even more so with the advent of HTML 5 (From the spec):

Although previous versions of HTML restricted the a element to only containing phrasing content (essentially, what was in previous versions referred to as "inline" content), the a element is now transparent; that is, an instance of the a element is now allowed to also contain flow content (essentially, what was in previous versions referred to as "block" content)—if the parent element of that instance of the a element is an element that is allowed to contain flow content.

这篇关于在HTML中拥有锚标签（&lt; a&gt;）的孩子是否合法？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！