使用META REFRESH重定向的SEO后果 [英] SEO consequences of redirecting with META REFRESH

问题描述

问题：使用META REFRESH重定向Web流量会带来什么样的SEO后果？

详细信息：我正在使用旧的静态网站迁移到新的地址。我在所有静态页面上使用meta刷新将流量重定向到新网站，如下所示：

 < meta HTTP-EQUIV =REFRESHcontent =0; url = http：//www.newsite.com/> 
  

当然，我宁愿将重定向直接写入Apache文件（或.htaccess文件），但由于某些服务器怪异超出了我的控制范围，所以我被困在元刷新中。

所以我想知道这会产生什么后果？网站的搜索排名是否会受到影响？新网站是否会被索引？我读过谷歌（等）将刷新视为一个适当的301重定向，只要它被设置为0秒（任何更长的时间将被视为垃圾邮件）。分析如何受到影响？

这里的真实行为是什么？任何想法？

解决方案

这并不理想，但显然没关系：

http：// sebastians- pamphlets.com/google-and-yahoo-treat-undelayed-meta-refresh-as-301-redirect/

还请阅读本页2 ：

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/answers-to-the-seo-professionals-litmus-test

Question: What are the SEO consequences of redirecting web traffic with a META REFRESH?

Details: I'm working with an old static site that's migrating to a new address. I'm redirecting traffic to the new site using meta refreshes on all static pages, like this:

<meta HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" content="0; url=http://www.newsite.com/">

Of course, I'd rather write the redirects directly into an Apache file (or an .htaccess file), but due to some server weirdness that's beyond my control, I'm stuck with the meta refreshes.

So I'm wondering what the consequences are here? Will the site's search ranking be affected? Will the new site be indexed? I've read that Google (et al.) will treat the refresh as a proper 301 redirect as long as it's set to 0 seconds (anything longer will be deemed spam). How will analytics be affected?

What's the true behavior here? Any thoughts?

解决方案

It's not ideal, but apparently it's ok:

http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/google-and-yahoo-treat-undelayed-meta-refresh-as-301-redirect/

Also read number 2 on this page:

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/answers-to-the-seo-professionals-litmus-test

这篇关于使用META REFRESH重定向的SEO后果的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！