RFC 2854如何过时RFC 1867? [英] How does RFC 2854 obsolete RFC 1867?

查看:150
本文介绍了RFC 2854如何过时RFC 1867?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

2584 过时 1867



这可能会降低对我不了解如何阅读RFC,但从我所了解的情况来看,1867年描述了如何使用HTML表单进行文件上传,而2584是关于HTML表单中未使用的MIME类型。两个完全不同的东西?

解决方案

RFC 2584 标志着互联网工程任务组参与HTML规范的结束。 万维网联盟继续进行其他工作。



RFC 2584的内容如下: b
$ b


IETF HTML工作组于1996年9月关闭,并将定义HTML的工作转移到万维网联盟(W3C )。


RFC 2584过期 RFC 1867 和许多其他RFC,因为HTML的全部内容已从IETF的权限中删除。以前与HTML相关的RFC的这种陈旧证实了这一决定。如果您要在IETF的RFC网站上搜索HTML,您会看到自RFC 2584以来几乎没有与HTML相关的活动。 b $ b

另请注意,RFC 1867是一个实验性的RFC。根据IETF的IETF之道


实验RFC适用于可能很有趣的规范,但目前还不清楚是否会对实现它们有很大的兴趣,或者它们是否会工作一次部署。也就是说,规范可能会解决一个问题,但如果不清楚很多人认为问题很重要,或者认为他们会打算解决规范问题,那么规范可能会被标记为实验性RFC。 p>


How (or why) does 2584 "obsolete" 1867?

This may simply come down to my not understanding how to read RFCs, but from what I can discern, 1867 describes how file uploading works with HTML forms and 2584 is about a MIME type not used in HTML forms. Two completely different things?

解决方案

RFC 2584 marks the end of the Internet Engineering Task Force's involvement in the HTML specification. Further work was continued by the World Wide Web Consortium.

RFC 2584 reads:

The IETF HTML working group closed Sep 1996, and work on defining HTML moved to the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

RFC 2584 obsoletes RFC 1867 and many other RFCs in the sense that HTML in its entirety was removed from the IETF's purview. This obsolesence of its previous HTML-related RFCs affirms that decision. And if you were to search for "HTML" on the IETF's RFC site, you'd see there's virtually no HTML-related activity since RFC 2584.


Also note that RFC 1867 was an experimental RFC. According to the IETF's "The Tao of IETF":

Experimental RFCs are for specifications that may be interesting, but for which it is unclear if there will be much interest in implementing them, or whether they will work once deployed. That is, a specification might solve a problem, but if it is not clear that many people think that the problem is important, or think that they will bother fixing the problem with the specification, the specification might be labeled an Experimental RFC.

这篇关于RFC 2854如何过时RFC 1867?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆