.html扩展名优于.php和.aspx的SEO吗？ [英] Is .html extension better than .php and .aspx for SEO?

问题描述

.html扩展是否比.php和.aspx更适合SEO？或延伸较少的网址更好，那么所有的

解决方案

扩展对排名和所有SEO爵士乐影响不大。

您网页的扩展程序可能并不一定会指示内容的生成方式。一个PHP或ASPX，虽然通常与动态内容相关联，但可以非常容易地呈现静态内容。此外，通过一些相对简单的配置，您可以获得所有.html页面，就像它们是一个动态页面一样（即index.html实际上是一个php文件）。

我认为你关心的是静态内容比动态内容更受青睐。 Google表示否：

GOOGLE：动态与静态URLs

网络与此相冲突，因为有些人会认为静态内容更好不会改变（并且因此不会使结果无效）。但我倾向于相信大谷歌。

我更关注页面内容而不是扩展名，因为这是机器人花费大部分时间进行处理的原因。 / p>

Is .html extension better than .php and .aspx for SEO ? or extension less url is better then all

解决方案

The extension has little effect on rankings and all that SEO jazz.

Your page's extension may not neccessarily indicate how the content was generated. A PHP or ASPX, whilst normally attributed with dynamic content, can quite easily always render static content. Furthermore, with some relatively easy configuration, you can get all .html pages to be processed as if they were a dynamic page (ie, index.html is actually a php file).

What I think you are concerned with is, "Is static content favoured over Dynamic content". Google says no:

GOOGLE: Dynamic vs Static URLS

The web is conflicted on this, as some people would expect static content to be preferable as it doesn't change (and thus won't invalidate results). But I tend to trust the big google.

I would focus more on the page content than the extension, as that is what the robots spend most of their time crunching.

这篇关于.html扩展名优于.php和.aspx的SEO吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！