有什么更好的使用HTML / CSS手工编辑或使用设计程序？为什么？ [英] Whats better using HTML/CSS edited by hand or using design programs? and why?

问题描述

对于设计网站来说，最好是通过学习HTML / CSS或使用网页设计程序来完成自我。为什么？

解决方案

在我作为Web开发人员的历史中，我在手动编码和Dreamweaver之间来回跳动。 p>

我最初开始编写HTML代码。当桌子布置为王时，这又回来了，编辑嵌套桌子变成了一件非常头疼的事情。加上缺乏用于可视化隐藏元素的好工具，这很快就变成了一场噩梦。

我开始使用Dreamweaver主要是为了加速我的表格设计工作流程。然而，很快，当我开始生产没有服务器后端的静态网站时，Dreamweaver的模板系统成为了上帝。能够更新一个模板并在整个静态网站上传播，将我的跨页面不一致性降低到几乎为零。 最近，整个web 2.0推送把我和几乎其他所有人都带回了手工编码游戏。我发现Dreamweaver并不适合兼容设计，因为它主要是以表格为中心的。我发现，现在我写的大部分HTML都非常简单直接，对编辑器的需求很少。另外，我现在的所有开发都是动态的，所以不再需要静态html生成模板系统。

For design websites is it better to do it your self by learning HTML/CSS or using web design programs? and why?

解决方案

I've bounced back and forth between hand coding and Dreamweaver in my history as a web developer.

I originally started out hand coding HTML. This was back in the day when table layout was king, and editing nested tables became a real headache. Couple this with a lack of good tools for visualizing hidden elements and this quickly became a nightmare.

I started using Dreamweaver primarily to speed up my table design workflow. Soon, however, Dreamweaver's templating system became a godsent when I started producing static websites that had no server backend. Being able to update one template and have it propagate across the entire static site cut down my cross-page inconsistencies to nearly zero.

More recently, the whole web 2.0 push has got me, and almost everyone else, back into the hand coding game. I found Dreamweaver wasn't really suitable for the compliant designs, since it was heavily table-centric. I find that most of the HTML I write these days is so straightforward and simple there's little need for an editor. Additionally, all my development is now dynamic once again, so there's no need for a static html generating template system anymore.

这篇关于有什么更好的使用HTML / CSS手工编辑或使用设计程序？为什么？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！