JWT的最佳HTTP授权标头类型 [英] Best HTTP Authorization header type for JWT

查看:203
本文介绍了JWT的最佳HTTP授权标头类型的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想知道 JWT令牌授权 HTTP标头类型是什么>。

I'm wondering what is the best appropriate Authorization HTTP header type for JWT tokens.

最受欢迎的类型之一是 Basic 。例如:

One of the probably most popular type is Basic. For instance:

Authorization: Basic QWxhZGRpbjpvcGVuIHNlc2FtZQ==

它处理两个参数,例如登录名和密码。所以它与JWT令牌无关。

It handle two parameters such as a login and a password. So it is not relevant for JWT tokens.

另外,我听说过 Bearer 类型,例如:

Also, I heard about Bearer type, for instance:

Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiYWRtaW4iOnRydWV9.TJVA95OrM7E2cBab30RMHrHDcEfxjoYZgeFONFh7HgQ

但是,我不知道它的含义。它与熊有关吗?

However, I don't know its meaning. Is it related to bears?

在HTTP 授权标题中是否有使用JWT令牌的特定方法?我们应该使用 Bearer ,还是应该简化并使用:

Is there a particular way to use JWT tokens in the HTTP Authorization header? Should we use Bearer, or should we simplify and just use:

Authorization: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiYWRtaW4iOnRydWV9.TJVA95OrM7E2cBab30RMHrHDcEfxjoYZgeFONFh7HgQ

由于

修改:

或者,只是 JWT HTTP标头:

Or maybe, just a JWT HTTP header:

JWT: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiYWRtaW4iOnRydWV9.TJVA95OrM7E2cBab30RMHrHDcEfxjoYZgeFONFh7HgQ


推荐答案

客户端发送访问令牌(JWT或任何其他令牌)的最佳HTTP头是授权承载认证方案的c $ c>标题。

The best HTTP header for your client to send an access token (JWT or any other token) is the Authorization header with the Bearer authentication scheme.

此方案由 RFC6750

示例:

GET /资源HTTP / 1.1
主持人:server.example.com
授权:Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIXVCJ9 ... TJVA95OrM7E20RMHrHDcEfxjoYZgeFONFh7HgQ

如果您需要更强的安全保护,您还可以考虑以下IETF草案: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture 。这个草案似乎是(废弃的?) https的一个很好的替代方案。 ://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac

If you need stronger security protection, you may also consider the following IETF draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture. This draft seems to be a good alternative to the (abandoned?) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac.

请注意,即使这个RFC和以上规范与OAuth2 Framework协议有关,它们可以在需要在客户端和服务器之间进行令牌交换的任何其他上下文中使用。

Note that even if this RFC and the above specifications are related to the OAuth2 Framework protocol, they can be used in any other contexts that require a token exchange between a client and a server.

与自定义<$不同您在问题中提到的c $ c> JWT 计划, 持票人一个在IANA注册

Unlike the custom JWT scheme you mention in your question, the Bearer one is registered at the IANA.

关于基本摘要身份验证方案,它们专用于使用用户名和密码进行身份验证(请参阅 RFC7616 RFC7617 )所以不适用于那种情况。

Concerning the Basic and Digest authentication schemes, they are dedicated to authentication using a username and a secret (see RFC7616 and RFC7617) so not applicable in that context.

这篇关于JWT的最佳HTTP授权标头类型的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆