rdf:seeAlso和rdfs之间的区别:seeAlso [英] Difference between rdf:seeAlso and rdfs:seeAlso
问题描述
rdf:seeAlso
和 rdfs:seeAlso
?
当我可以使用 rdf:seeAlso
,当我可以使用 rdfs:seeAlso
?
When I can use rdf:seeAlso
and when I can use rdfs:seeAlso
?
你能做任何例子吗?
推荐答案
首先,请注意 rdf
和 rdfs
分别是通常用于引用RDF语法和RDF模式词汇表的前缀。 rdf
通常用于 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# ,以便 rdf:seeAlso
将展开 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/ 22 RDF语法纳秒#seeAlso 。但是,如果您遵循词汇表参考,则不会为<$ c $ c> seeAlso 找到定义的术语。 RDF语法用于基本类型,例如rdf:type,rdf:XMLLiteral和rdf:langString。 RDF Schema词汇表通常绑定到 rdfs
前缀,并且位于 http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# 。它主要用于定义在RDF图上执行简单推理时有用的术语,例如 rdfs:subClassOf
, rdfs:domain
和 rdfs:range
。
First, note that rdf
and rdfs
are prefixes commonly used to reference the RDF syntax and RDF schema vocabularies respectively. The rdf
is typically used for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#, so that rdf:seeAlso
would expand to http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#seeAlso. However, if you follow the vocabulary reference, you won't find a term defined for seeAlso
. The RDF syntax is used for basic types such as rdf:type, rdf:XMLLiteral, and rdf:langString. the RDF Schema vocabulary is typically bound to the rdfs
prefix, and is at http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#. It is mostly used to define terms useful in performing simple reasoning over RDF graphs, such as rdfs:subClassOf
, rdfs:domain
, and rdfs:range
.
实际上,两个词汇表之间定义的术语最终是任意的地点,回想起来,应该只有一个单词的词汇定义和一个更容易理解的位置(例如 http://www.w3.org/ns/rdf# ),但现在为时已晚。
In reality, the terms defined between the two vocabularies end up being in arbitrary locations, and on retrospect, there should have probably been just a single vocabulary definition and a more easily understood location (such as http://www.w3.org/ns/rdf#), but too late for that now.
为什么要使用 rdfs:seeAlso
目前还不清楚。描述说有关主题资源的更多信息。,但是有关于如何使用它的规则。在关联数据中,它可以用于执行它所说的内容,而假设的链接数据客户端可能会取消引用 rdfs的IRI值:seeAlso
以查找可能包含的更多信息。有用。
Why use rdfs:seeAlso
is unclear. The description says "Further information about the subject resource.", but there's rules defined for how to use it. In Linked Data, it can be used to do just what it says, and a hypothetical linked data client might dereference IRI values of rdfs:seeAlso
to find out more information that might be useful.
您可以在 RDF Concepts 文档和RDF工作组的其他出版物。
You can find out more in the RDF Concepts document and other publications of the RDF Working Group.
这篇关于rdf:seeAlso和rdfs之间的区别:seeAlso的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!