Oracle下的NetBeans IDE [英] NetBeans IDE under Oracle

问题描述

我对我刚刚阅读的内容感到有点害怕。我做了一些研究，因为我想开始用Java编程，我得出结论，NetBeans是我最好的IDE，因为它具有强大的Swing GUI Designer和强大的Jasper Reports报告（iReport）。

I'm a bit freaked about what I just read. I did some research, as I want to start programming in Java, and I came to the conclusion that NetBeans is the best IDE for me because of its capable Swing GUI Designer and powerful reporting with Jasper Reports (iReport).

然而，Oracle（即将收购Sun）似乎并不关心NetBeans。由于我将从现在开始用Java开始构建appz，我想知道您对以下事项的看法：

Yet Oracle (who will soon buy Sun) doesn't seem to care about NetBeans. As I will start building appz in Java no too long from now, I would like to know your opinion on the following matter:

我还是继续使用NetBeans传闻甲骨文会停止它或者我会选择另一个IDE吗？

Shall I continue using NetBeans in spite of the rumours that Oracle will discontinue it or shall I make another the IDE of choice?

PS：基本上NetBeans会是首选，但由于目前的情况，我怀疑这个决定。

PS: Basically NetBeans would be the choice but because of the current circumstances I'm doubting this decision.

谢谢

推荐答案

Oracle已投入大量资金时间和金钱融入自己的产品，JDeveloper。它有一些非常漂亮的功能。但它在业界从未有过太大的吸引力，因为许多Java开发人员不喜欢使用专有软件，尽管Oracle在开放标准方面做出了相当大的贡献。

Oracle have put a lot of time and money into their own product, JDeveloper. It has some pretty neat features. But it has never got much traction in the industry, because many Java developers don't like using proprietary software, even though Oracle make quite a big play over their commit to open standards.

无论如何，目前Oracle仍在将大量新获得的BEA WebLogic功能集成到JDeveloper套件中。但我敢肯定，一旦他们达成了收购Sun的协议，他们就会开始考虑他们可以从NetBeans中获取什么。因为无论你怎么看待Larry Ellison的商业方法，他都知道一美元的价值。如果在NetBeans中有值得拥有的东西，它们将不会被丢弃，它们将最终出现在JDeveloper中。

Anyway, at the moment Oracle are still integrating a lot of their freshly acquired BEA WebLogic functionality into the JDeveloper suite. But I'm sure that once they have sealed the deal to buy Sun they will start to look at what they can take from NetBeans. Because whatever you may think about Larry Ellison's business methods, he knows the value of a dollar. If there are things worth having in NetBeans, they will not be thrown away, they will end up in JDeveloper.

编辑

所以你说它会放弃NetBeans
并挽救一些可以
进入JDeveloper的部分？

So you say it will abandon NetBeans and salvage some pieces which will go into JDeveloper?

从长远来看，Oracle不会维护两个Java IDE。但看看他们处理之前收购的策略（Seibel，JD Edwards，BEA等）。在制定计划让客户使用Oracle自己的品牌应用程序时，Oracle一直保持这些产品的最新状态。在某些情况下，这意味着倾销Oracle的产品以支持所收购的产品（Seibel Analytics，BEA WebLogic Server）。

In the long run Oracle will not maintain two Java IDEs. But look at their strategy for handling previous acquisitions (Seibel, JD Edwards, BEA, etc). Oracle have kept those products current while they devised a plan for getting the customers onto Oracle's own brand applications. In some cases this meant dumping Oracle's offering in favour of the acquired product (Seibel Analytics, BEA WebLogic Server).

Oracle已就MySQL发表过类似的声音。人们可能会嗤之以鼻，但我认为甲骨文将保持MySQL的发展，部分原因是拉里认为他们可以从中赚钱，但也只是为了飙升微软试图刷掉MySQL客户群。

Oracle has made similar sounding pronouncements with regards to MySQL. People may scoff, but I think Oracle will keep MySQL going, partly because Larry thinks they can make money from it but also just to spike Microsoft's attempts to swipe the MySQL customer base.

我还没有看到有关Oracle对NetBeans的意图的任何官方消息。所以以下只是我的推测。 Oracle不会杀掉NetBeans。如果它这样做，那么所有NetBeans用户都可能会迁移到Eclipse（因为很多人都认为Pascal认为JDeveloper很糟糕）。事实上，甲骨文可能会将其保留一段时间。

I haven't read anything official regarding Oracle's intentions for NetBeans. So the following is just my conjecture. Oracle won't kill off NetBeans. If it did that then all the NetBeans users would probably decamp to Eclipse (because many people share Pascal's belief that "JDeveloper sucks"). Indeed Oracle will probably keep it going for some time yet.

与此同时，他们将创建NetBeans中的功能清单，这些功能优于JDeveloper等效功能或没有等效功能，并且可以支持Oracle的Fusion程序。例如，埃里森一直赞扬他对JavaFX的钦佩。我不知情的感觉是，将这些功能移植到JDeveloper中会比将Fusion内容转换为NetBeans更容易。我可能错了。也许更有意义的是利用NetBeans更广泛的市场渗透并削减JDeveloper。

In the meantime they will create an inventory of the features in NetBeans which are better than the JDeveloper equivalent or which have no equivalent, and which can support Oracle's Fusion programme. For instance Ellison has been vocal in his admiration for JavaFX. My uninformed feeling is that it will be easier to port that functionality into JDeveloper than it will be to reverse the Fusion stuff into NetBeans. I might well be wrong about that. Perhaps it would make more sense to leverage NetBeans' broader market penetration and cut JDeveloper loose.

我认为您应该开始使用NetBeans，因为该功能不会在一夜之间消失。

Either way I think you should start working with NetBeans, because that functionality isn't going to disappear overnight.

更新

InfoWorld刚刚（27-JAN-2010）发布 Oracle对Sun的计划摘要。相关位是

InfoWorld has just (27-JAN-2010) published a summary of Oracle's plans for Sun. The pertinent bit is

NetBeans，Sun驱动的开源
与IDE竞争的Java IDE
JDeveloper Kurian说，在Eclipse平台上，
将继续作为Java
开发者的轻量级
开发环境。但是
JDeveloper继续作为Oracle的
企业开发工具。

NetBeans, the Sun-driven open source Java IDE that has competed with Oracle JDeveloper and the Eclipse platform, will remain as a "lightweight development environment for Java developers," Kurian said. But JDeveloper continues as Oracle's enterprise development tool.

这篇关于Oracle下的NetBeans IDE的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！