iFrames和法律 [英] iFrames and Law

问题描述

假设演员A在iFrames中有演员B的站点。除网址外，网站没有区别。网址完全不同。如果演员A要求演员B允许使用B的网站吗？是否有法律禁止在iFrames网站上放置其他网站？

Suppose an actor A has the site of an actor B in iFrames. There is no difference in the sites except the url. Urls are totally different. Should the actor A ask a permission of the actor B for using B's site? Is there any law that forbid placing other site on a site in iFrames?

推荐答案

不是编程问题，但至少让我帮助您链接到网站。 plagiarismtoday.com的所有者已经有了一些您的担忧，虽然不是律师，却收集了相当多的信息。

Not a programming question, but at least let me help you with a link to a site. The owner of plagiarismtoday.com have had some of your concerns and, although not a lawyer, have collected quite a bit of information.

http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/07/is-the -diggbar-content-theft /

阅读框架法，并点击华盛顿邮报v的案例链接。 TotalNews

Read The Law on Framing and follow the link to the case of Washington Post v. TotalNews

您还应该检查您所在的国家/地区和州的法律，没有标准的法律解决方案，因为它从一个地方变为另一个地方，许多国家/地区都有没有关于你问的法律。但是，让我告诉你，网络似乎由两种心态或法律哲学主导：

You should also check your country and local state laws, there is no such thing as a standard legal solution because it changes from one place to the other and many countries do not have laws on what you are asking. However, let me tell you, the web seems to be dominated by two frame of mind, or law philosophy:

• lex mercatoria：这些人倾向于认为网络是商业和商业法律应该适用，这些法律主要来自更多和民法。


• lex retis：这些人说网络是无政府状态，没有法律可以治理它

PS：我是律师。即使这有点复杂，我希望你能得到一个想法。

PS: I am a lawyer. Even if this is a bit complicated, I hope you can get an idea.

这篇关于iFrames和法律的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！